Weatherly Jeffrey N, Nurnberger Jeri T, Sturdevant Megan
Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202-8380, USA.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):102-7. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.102.
This study addressed whether negative anticipatory contrast results in a decrease in the value of the low-valued substance. Rats responded in training conditions designed to produce negative contrast. They then responded in test sessions in which the low-valued substance from the training sessions was the reinforcer for an operant response. Despite the finding of contrast in the training conditions, the low-valued substance was a more effective reinforcer early in testing after training conditions in which it had been followed by access to the high-valued substance than after training conditions in which it had not. The findings question the devaluation explanation for contrast but may be similar to other findings of reversals of "preference."