Puttinger Heidi
Abteilung für Nephrologie und Dialyse, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005;117 Suppl 6:35-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-005-0493-x.
Patients with chronic kidney-graft failure who are starting peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment need special consideration. The question of whether mortality is higher in these patients than in those who have not received a transplant is controversial. However, some studies suggest that differences in mortality between these groups are mainly explained by variations in age, duration of dialysis and comorbidity. One study showed similar survival between patients with chronic graft failure treated with hemodialysis (HD) and those on PD, but there is some evidence that residual renal function in PD patients with chronic graft failure declines faster than in PD-patients without transplants. Until now there have been no data on whether PD has a positive influence on the course of residual renal clearances compared with the influence of HD. The fact that PD patients with transplants show significantly higher peritoneal transport rates than patients without transplants may have an influence on technique survival. In patients with chronic graft failure, the type and dose of immunosuppressive therapy, as well as its influence on the incidence of acute rejections, residual renal function and infection rates, are also controversial. Immunosuppressive therapy may preserve residual graft function, but these patients have a higher risk of Gram-negative peritonitis, a shorter interval between start of dialysis and first episode of peritonitis, and a higher risk of catheter infections with Staphylococcus aureus than PD patients without transplants. In conclusion, PD is an acceptable treatment option for patients with chronic kidney-graft failure provided that the above clinical aspects are considered (e.g., intensified monitoring of infections and residual renal function).
开始接受腹膜透析(PD)治疗的慢性肾移植失败患者需要特殊考虑。这些患者的死亡率是否高于未接受移植的患者这一问题存在争议。然而,一些研究表明,这些组之间死亡率的差异主要由年龄、透析时间和合并症的变化来解释。一项研究表明,接受血液透析(HD)治疗的慢性移植失败患者与接受PD治疗的患者生存率相似,但有证据表明,慢性移植失败的PD患者的残余肾功能下降速度比未接受移植的PD患者更快。到目前为止,尚无关于与HD相比,PD对残余肾清除率进程是否有积极影响的数据。移植的PD患者腹膜转运率明显高于未移植患者这一事实可能会对技术生存率产生影响。在慢性移植失败患者中,免疫抑制治疗的类型和剂量及其对急性排斥反应发生率、残余肾功能和感染率的影响也存在争议。免疫抑制治疗可能会保留残余移植功能,但这些患者发生革兰氏阴性腹膜炎的风险更高,透析开始至首次腹膜炎发作的间隔时间更短,与未移植的PD患者相比,金黄色葡萄球菌导管感染的风险更高。总之,如果考虑到上述临床因素(如加强对感染和残余肾功能的监测),PD是慢性肾移植失败患者可接受的治疗选择。