• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对边缘型人格障碍患者的药物干预措施。

Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.

作者信息

Binks C A, Fenton M, McCarthy L, Lee T, Adams C E, Duggan C

机构信息

University of Bristol, 8 Priory, Bristol, UK, BS8 1TZ.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD005653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005653.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005653
PMID:16437535
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is prevalent (2% in the general population, 20% among psychiatry in-patients) and has a major impact on health facilities as those affected often present in crisis but then make poor use of further attempts to help them.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We conducted a systematic search of 26 specialist and general bibliographic databases (October 2002) and searched relevant reference lists for further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials comparing any psychoactive drugs with any other treatment for people with borderline personality disorder.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently selected, quality assessed and data extracted studies. For binary outcomes we calculated a standard estimation of the risk ratio (RR), its 95% confidence interval (CI), and where possible the number need to help/harm (NNT/H). For continuous outcomes, endpoint data were preferred to change data. Non-skewed data from valid scales were synthesised using a weighted mean difference (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

We found ten small (total n=554), short, randomised studies involving eight comparisons from which we could extract usable data. Studies comparing antidepressants with placebo were small (total n=79, 2 RCTs) but for ratings of anger fluoxetine may offer some improvement for those on antidepressant therapy over placebo (n=22, 1 RCT, RR anger not improved 0.30 CI 0.10 to 0.85, NNT 2 CI 2 to 9). The one small study investigating the important outcome of attempted suicide found no difference between mianserin and placebo (n=38, 1 RCT, RR 0.82 CI 0.44 to 1.54). Haloperidol may be better than antidepressants for symptoms of hostility and psychotism. There were few differences between MAOIs and placebo except that people given MAOIs were less hostile (n=62, 1 RCT, MD -9.19 CI -16.12 to -2.26). Although some ratings were statistically significant the comparison of MAOIs with antipsychotics did not show convincing differences. Antipsychotics may effect some mental state symptoms more effectively than placebo but results are difficult to interpret clinically and there is little evidence of advantage of one antipsychotic over another. Finally mood stabilisers such as divalporex may help mental state (n=16, 1 RCT, RR no improvement in mental state 0.58 CI 0.36 to 0.94, NNT 3 CI 2 to 17) but data are far from conclusive.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological treatment of people with BPD is not based on good evidence from trials and it is arguable that future use of medication should be from within randomised trials. Current trials suggest that the positive effect of antidepressants, in particular, could be considerable. Well designed, conducted and reported clinically meaningful trials are possible and needed with, perhaps, the question of antidepressant versus placebo being addressed first.

摘要

背景

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)很常见(普通人群中占2%,精神科住院患者中占20%),并对医疗机构产生重大影响,因为患者常在危机状态下就医,但后续对进一步治疗措施的利用率很低。

目的

评估药物干预对边缘型人格障碍患者的效果。

检索策略

我们于2002年10月对26个专业和综合书目数据库进行了系统检索,并检索了相关参考文献列表以获取更多试验。

选择标准

我们纳入了所有比较任何精神活性药物与其他治疗方法对边缘型人格障碍患者疗效的随机临床试验。

数据收集与分析

我们独立选择、评估质量并提取数据。对于二元结局,我们计算风险比(RR)的标准估计值、其95%置信区间(CI),并在可能的情况下计算需治疗人数(NNT)。对于连续结局,终点数据优于变化数据。来自有效量表的非偏态数据采用加权均数差(WMD)进行综合分析。

主要结果

我们发现了10项小型(共n = 554)、短期的随机研究,涉及8项比较,从中我们可以提取可用数据。比较抗抑郁药与安慰剂的研究规模较小(共n = 79,2项随机对照试验),但对于愤怒评分,氟西汀可能比安慰剂更能改善接受抗抑郁治疗的患者的情况(n = 22,1项随机对照试验,RR愤怒未改善0.30,CI 0.10至0.85,NNT 2,CI 2至9)。一项调查自杀未遂这一重要结局的小型研究发现,米安色林与安慰剂之间无差异(n = 38,1项随机对照试验,RR 0.82,CI 0.44至1.54)。对于敌意和精神病性症状,氟哌啶醇可能优于抗抑郁药。单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOI)与安慰剂之间差异不大,只是接受MAOI治疗的患者敌意较小(n = 62,1项随机对照试验,MD -9.19,CI -16.12至-2.26)。虽然一些评分具有统计学意义,但MAOI与抗精神病药物的比较未显示出令人信服的差异。抗精神病药物可能比安慰剂更有效地改善某些精神状态症状,但结果在临床上难以解释,且几乎没有证据表明一种抗精神病药物优于另一种。最后,丙戊酸盐等心境稳定剂可能有助于改善精神状态(n = 16,1项随机对照试验,RR精神状态未改善0.58,CI 0.36至0.94,NNT 3,CI 2至17),但数据远非结论性的。

作者结论

对边缘型人格障碍患者进行药物治疗缺乏来自试验的充分证据,未来用药是否应基于随机试验仍存在争议。目前的试验表明,特别是抗抑郁药的积极效果可能相当显著。设计良好、实施得当且报告规范的具有临床意义的试验是可行的且有必要进行,或许首先应解决抗抑郁药与安慰剂对比的问题。

相似文献

1
Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD005653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005653.
2
Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.药物干预治疗边缘型人格障碍患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD012956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012956.pub2.
3
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD005652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005652.
4
Olanzapine IM or velotab for acutely disturbed/agitated people with suspected serious mental illnesses.奥氮平注射剂或速溶片用于疑似患有严重精神疾病的急性精神紊乱/躁动人群。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD003729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003729.pub2.
5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
6
Non-antipsychotic catecholaminergic drugs for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.用于抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍的非抗精神病类儿茶酚胺能药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 18;1(1):CD000458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000458.pub3.
7
Quetiapine for schizophrenia.喹硫平用于治疗精神分裂症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD000967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000967.pub2.
8
Benzodiazepines for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的苯二氮䓬类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD006391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006391.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.用于感染HIV的成年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric analysis of global research on dialectical behavior therapy from 1987 to 2024.1987年至2024年全球辩证行为疗法研究的文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 20;16:1450497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1450497. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychotherapeutic Change in Intensive Day Treatment for Personality Disorders: A Single Case Study of Quantitative and Qualitative Change in Agency and Communion.人格障碍强化日间治疗中的心理治疗性改变:一项关于能动性与共融性定量和定性改变的单病例研究
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Feb;19(1):e70007. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70007.
3
Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.
药物干预治疗边缘型人格障碍患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD012956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012956.pub2.
4
Cessation of Deliberate Self-Harm Behavior in Patients With Borderline Personality Traits Treated With Outpatient Dialectical Behavior Therapy.接受门诊辩证行为疗法治疗的边缘性人格特质患者故意自伤行为的停止情况
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 26;12:578230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578230. eCollection 2021.
5
Unmet challenges in treating hypertension in patients with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review.边缘型人格障碍患者高血压治疗中未解决的挑战:一项系统综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(37):e17101. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017101.
6
Suicidality in Borderline Personality Disorder.边缘型人格障碍的自杀倾向。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 May 28;55(6):223. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060223.
7
Qualitative Analysis of Resources and Barriers Related to Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder in the United States.美国边缘型人格障碍治疗相关资源与障碍的定性分析
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):167-172. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600108. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
8
Prescribing for personality disorder: qualitative study of interviews with general and forensic consultant psychiatrists.人格障碍的处方开具:对普通及法医顾问精神科医生访谈的定性研究
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Jun;38(3):116-21. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.044081.
9
A cholinergic hypothesis of the unconscious in affective disorders.情感障碍无意识的胆碱能假说。
Front Neurosci. 2013 Nov 22;7:220. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00220. eCollection 2013.
10
The human brain-from cells to society.人类大脑:从细胞到社会。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 7;7:359. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00359. eCollection 2013.