Pan Wei-Hua, Clawson Gary A
Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Hershey Medical Center, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
J Cell Biochem. 2006 May 1;98(1):14-35. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20790.
Although Nature's antisense approaches are clearly impressive, this Perspectives article focuses on the experimental uses of antisense reagents (ASRs) for control of biological processes. ASRs comprise antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), and their catalytically active counterparts ribozymes and DNAzymes, as well as small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). ASOs and ribozymes/DNAzymes target RNA molecules on the basis of Watson-Crick base pairing in sequence-specific manner. ASOs generally result in destruction of the target RNA by RNase-H mediated mechanisms, although they may also sterically block translation, also resulting in loss of protein production. Ribozymes and DNAzymes cleave target RNAs after base pairing via their antisense flanking arms. siRNAs, which contain both sense and antisense regions from a target RNA, can mediate target RNA destruction via RNAi and the RISC, although they can also function at the transcriptional level. A considerable number of ASRs (mostly ASOs) have progressed into clinical trials, although most have relatively long histories in Phase I/II settings. Clinical trial results are surprisingly difficult to find, although few ASRs appear to have yet established efficacy in Phase III levels. Evolution of ASRs has included: (a) Modifications to ASOs to render them nuclease resistant, with analogous modifications to siRNAs being developed; and (b) Development of strategies to select optimal sites for targeting. Perhaps the biggest barrier to effective therapies with ASRs is the "Delivery Problem." Various liposomal vehicles have been used for systemic delivery with some success, and recent modifications appear to enhance systemic delivery, at least to liver. Various nanoparticle formulations are now being developed which may also enhance delivery. Going forward, topical applications of ASRs would seem to have the best chances for success. In summary, modifications to ASRs to enhance stability, improve targeting, and incremental improvements in delivery vehicles continue to make ASRs attractive as molecular therapeutics, but their advance toward the bedside has been agonizingly slow.
尽管大自然的反义技术方法显然令人印象深刻,但这篇观点文章重点关注反义试剂(ASR)在生物过程控制方面的实验用途。ASR包括反义寡核苷酸(ASO)及其具有催化活性的对应物核酶和脱氧核酶,以及小干扰RNA(siRNA)。ASO和核酶/脱氧核酶基于沃森-克里克碱基配对以序列特异性方式靶向RNA分子。ASO通常通过核糖核酸酶H介导的机制导致靶RNA的破坏,尽管它们也可能在空间上阻断翻译,同样导致蛋白质产生的损失。核酶和脱氧核酶通过其反义侧翼臂在碱基配对后切割靶RNA。siRNA包含来自靶RNA的有义链和反义链区域,可通过RNA干扰和RNA诱导沉默复合体介导靶RNA的破坏,尽管它们也可在转录水平发挥作用。相当数量的ASR(主要是ASO)已进入临床试验,尽管大多数在I/II期阶段已有较长历史。令人惊讶的是,很难找到临床试验结果,尽管似乎很少有ASR在III期阶段确立疗效。ASR的发展包括:(a)对ASO进行修饰以使其具有核酸酶抗性,同时也在开发对siRNA的类似修饰;(b)开发选择最佳靶向位点的策略。也许ASR有效治疗的最大障碍是“递送问题”。各种脂质体载体已用于全身递送并取得了一些成功,最近的修饰似乎增强了全身递送,至少对肝脏是这样。现在正在开发各种纳米颗粒制剂,这也可能增强递送。展望未来,ASR的局部应用似乎成功机会最大。总之,对ASR进行修饰以提高稳定性、改善靶向性以及对递送载体进行逐步改进,继续使ASR作为分子疗法具有吸引力,但它们走向临床应用的进展极其缓慢。