Suppr超能文献

视觉与触觉的结合取决于空间上的接近程度。

The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity.

作者信息

Gepshtein Sergei, Burge Johannes, Ernst Marc O, Banks Martin S

机构信息

Vision Science Program, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2005 Dec 28;5(11):1013-23. doi: 10.1167/5.11.7.

Abstract

The nervous system often combines visual and haptic information about object properties such that the combined estimate is more precise than with vision or haptics alone. We examined how the system determines when to combine the signals. Presumably, signals should not be combined when they come from different objects. The likelihood that signals come from different objects is highly correlated with the spatial separation between the signals, so we asked how the spatial separation between visual and haptic signals affects their combination. To do this, we first created conditions for each observer in which the effect of combination--the increase in discrimination precision with two modalities relative to performance with one modality--should be maximal. Then under these conditions, we presented visual and haptic stimuli separated by different spatial distances and compared human performance with predictions of a model that combined signals optimally. We found that discrimination precision was essentially optimal when the signals came from the same location, and that discrimination precision was poorer when the signals came from different locations. Thus, the mechanism of visual-haptic combination is specialized for signals that coincide in space.

摘要

神经系统常常会整合有关物体属性的视觉和触觉信息,从而使整合后的估计比单独依靠视觉或触觉时更加精确。我们研究了该系统如何确定何时整合信号。据推测,当信号来自不同物体时,不应进行整合。信号来自不同物体的可能性与信号之间的空间距离高度相关,因此我们探究了视觉和触觉信号之间的空间距离如何影响它们的整合。为此,我们首先为每位观察者创建了这样的条件,即整合效应(与单一模态相比,两种模态下辨别精度的提高)应达到最大值。然后在这些条件下,我们呈现了以不同空间距离分隔的视觉和触觉刺激,并将人类的表现与最优整合信号的模型预测进行了比较。我们发现,当信号来自同一位置时,辨别精度基本达到最优,而当信号来自不同位置时,辨别精度则较差。因此,视觉 - 触觉整合机制专门针对在空间上重合的信号。

相似文献

1
The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity.
J Vis. 2005 Dec 28;5(11):1013-23. doi: 10.1167/5.11.7.
2
Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.
Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1361-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4896-5. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
3
Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch.
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;179(4):595-606. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0814-y. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
4
Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(3):321-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3220-7. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
5
Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception.
Curr Biol. 2003 Mar 18;13(6):483-8. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00133-7.
6
Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
7
The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching.
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1026-9. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
8
Integration of vision and haptics during tool use.
J Vis. 2009 Jun 8;9(6):3.1-13. doi: 10.1167/9.6.3.
9
Noninformative vision improves haptic spatial perception.
Curr Biol. 2002 Oct 1;12(19):1661-4. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01178-8.
10
Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Sep;190(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1447-0. Epub 2008 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Multisensory causal inference is feature-specific, not object-based.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 25;378(1886):20220345. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0345. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
4
Experimentally disambiguating models of sensory cue integration.
J Vis. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.1.5.
5
Causal inference regulates audiovisual spatial recalibration via its influence on audiovisual perception.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Nov 15;17(11):e1008877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008877. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Causal inference and the evolution of opposite neurons.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 7;118(36). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112686118.
7
Does Vergence Affect Perceived Size?
Vision (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;5(3):33. doi: 10.3390/vision5030033.
8
The effect of active hand movement on visually perceived depth direction.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0245000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245000. eCollection 2021.
9
Exploring the time window for causal inference and the multisensory integration of actions and their visual effects.
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Aug 5;7(8):192056. doi: 10.1098/rsos.192056. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
See What You Feel: A Crossmodal Tool for Measuring Haptic Size Illusions.
Iperception. 2020 Aug 10;11(4):2041669520944425. doi: 10.1177/2041669520944425. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr;162(2):172-80. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2128-2. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
2
The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.
Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029.
4
Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception.
Curr Biol. 2003 Mar 18;13(6):483-8. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00133-7.
5
Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses.
Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1627-30. doi: 10.1126/science.1075396.
6
When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation.
Curr Biol. 2002 May 14;12(10):834-7. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00836-9.
7
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33. doi: 10.1038/415429a.
8
Multisensory integration and crossmodal attention effects in the human brain.
Science. 2001 Jun 8;292(5523):1791. doi: 10.1126/science.292.5523.1791a.
9
Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance.
Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):711-24. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00277-7.
10
Illusions. What you see is what you hear.
Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):788. doi: 10.1038/35048669.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验