• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莫氏显微外科手术中使用无菌手套与非无菌手套:感染率不受影响。

Sterile versus nonsterile gloves during Mohs micrographic surgery: infection rate is not affected.

作者信息

Rhinehart Major Brandon M, Murphy Major Michael E, Farley Mary F, Albertini John G

机构信息

MEDOAC, Wuerzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32031.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32031.x
PMID:16442035
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is an outpatient procedure that has become the treatment of choice for certain cutaneous malignancies. Although the major steps in this procedure are relatively standardized, one difference involves the use of sterile or nonsterile, clean gloves during the tumor removal phase.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective chart review study was performed to evaluate whether infection rates are affected by the use of sterile versus nonsterile gloves in the tumor extirpation phase of MMS.

METHODS

This study evaluated the surgical records of 1,810 consecutive Mohs patients, of which 1,239 Mohs patients (1,400 Mohs procedures) met inclusion criteria. Age, sex, tumor diagnosis, anatomic location, number of Mohs stages, area of the defect, closure type, cartilage exposure, and sterile versus nonsterile glove use were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five infections were identified. Statistically significant infection rates were discovered for patients with cartilage fenestration with secondary healing and malignant melanoma diagnosis only. There was no statistical difference in infection rates with all other measured variables to include the use of sterile or clean, nonsterile gloves.

CONCLUSION

Our study lends support to the contention that clean, nonsterile gloves are safe and effective for use in the tumor extirpation phase of MMS, at a significant cost savings.

摘要

背景

莫氏显微外科手术(MMS)是一种门诊手术,已成为某些皮肤恶性肿瘤的首选治疗方法。尽管该手术的主要步骤相对标准化,但一个差异在于在肿瘤切除阶段使用无菌或非无菌的清洁手套。

目的

进行这项回顾性图表审查研究,以评估在MMS的肿瘤切除阶段使用无菌手套与非无菌手套是否会影响感染率。

方法

本研究评估了1810例连续的莫氏患者的手术记录,其中1239例莫氏患者(1400例莫氏手术)符合纳入标准。记录并评估年龄、性别、肿瘤诊断、解剖位置、莫氏分期数量、缺损面积、闭合类型、软骨暴露情况以及使用无菌手套与非无菌手套的情况。

结果

共发现25例感染。仅在软骨开窗且二期愈合以及诊断为恶性黑色素瘤的患者中发现了具有统计学意义的感染率。在所有其他测量变量(包括使用无菌或清洁的非无菌手套)方面,感染率没有统计学差异。

结论

我们的研究支持以下观点,即清洁的非无菌手套在MMS的肿瘤切除阶段使用是安全有效的,且能显著节省成本。

相似文献

1
Sterile versus nonsterile gloves during Mohs micrographic surgery: infection rate is not affected.莫氏显微外科手术中使用无菌手套与非无菌手套:感染率不受影响。
Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32031.x.
2
Infection rates of wound repairs during Mohs micrographic surgery using sterile versus nonsterile gloves: a prospective randomized pilot study.在 Mohs 显微外科手术中使用无菌手套与非无菌手套修复伤口的感染率:一项前瞻性随机试点研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2011 May;37(5):651-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01949.x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
3
Comparison of the prevalence of surgical site infection with use of sterile versus nonsterile gloves for resection and reconstruction during Mohs surgery.比较在 Mohs 手术中进行切除和重建时使用无菌手套与非无菌手套的手术部位感染发生率。
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Mar;40(3):234-9. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12438. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
4
Can Nonsterile Gloves for Dermatologic Procedures Be Cost-Effective without Compromising Infection Rates?用于皮肤科手术的非无菌手套能否在不影响感染率的情况下具有成本效益?
Skinmed. 2019 Sep 9;17(3):155-159. eCollection 2019.
5
Adverse events associated with mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers.与Mohs 显微外科手术相关的不良事件:23 个中心 20821 例的多中心前瞻性队列研究。
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Dec;149(12):1378-85. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6255.
6
Comparison of Sterile vs Nonsterile Gloves in Cutaneous Surgery and Common Outpatient Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.在皮肤外科手术和常见的门诊牙科手术中,无菌手套与非无菌手套的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Sep 1;152(9):1008-14. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1965.
7
Commentary: Comparison of the prevalence of surgical site infection with use of sterile and nonsterile gloves for resection and reconstruction during Mohs surgery.评论:莫氏手术切除与重建过程中使用无菌手套和非无菌手套时手术部位感染发生率的比较
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Mar;40(3):240. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12434.
8
Prospective study of wound infections in Mohs micrographic surgery using clean surgical technique in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics.前瞻性研究在不使用预防性抗生素的情况下,采用清洁外科技术进行莫氏显微手术的伤口感染。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Nov;63(5):842-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.07.029. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
9
Incidence of infection after Mohs micrographic and dermatologic surgery before and after implementation of new sterilization guidelines.新消毒指南实施前后 Mohs 显微外科和皮肤科手术后感染的发生率。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jun;70(6):1088-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
10
Are sterile gloves necessary in nonsurgical dental extractions?在非手术性牙齿拔除术中是否需要使用无菌手套?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jul;63(7):936-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Dermatologic Surgery.优化皮肤科手术中手术部位感染的预防
J Cutan Med Surg. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):167-178. doi: 10.1177/12034754241303086. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
The Added Value of Sterility in Minor Surgical Procedures in Preventing Infection: A Systematic Review.小型外科手术中无菌操作在预防感染方面的附加价值:一项系统评价。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 22;12(21):2101. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212101.
3
Postprocedural infection rate after minor surgical procedures performed with and without sterile gloves: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
使用和不使用无菌手套进行小手术术后的感染率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7341-7352. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001993.
4
State of the Evidence for Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction.皮肤癌重建的证据现状。
Facial Plast Surg. 2023 Jun;39(3):220-229. doi: 10.1055/a-2008-2798. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Patient-dependent risk factors for wound infection after skin surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.患者相关的皮肤手术后伤口感染风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Nov;19(7):1748-1757. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13780. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
6
Reappraising Elements of the Aseptic Technique in Dermatology: A Review.重新评估皮肤科无菌技术的要素:综述
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):e2021126. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1101a126. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Postoperative Infections in Dermatologic Surgery: The Role of Wound Cultures.皮肤科手术中的术后感染:伤口培养的作用。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46(10):1294-1299. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002317.
8
Evidence-based Sterility: The Evolving Role of Field Sterility in Skin and Minor Hand Surgery.循证无菌:现场无菌在皮肤及手部小手术中不断演变的作用
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Nov 21;7(11):e2481. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002481. eCollection 2019 Nov.
9
Non-sterile gloves in minor lacerations and excisions?小伤口和切除术使用非无菌手套?
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Mar;63(3):217.