Suppr超能文献

16层多探测器CT定量冠状动脉狭窄程度的准确性:横断面和纵向血管重建的评估

Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.

作者信息

Cury Ricardo C, Ferencik Maros, Achenbach Stephan, Pomerantsev Eugene, Nieman Koen, Moselewski Fabian, Abbara Suhny, Jang Ik-Kyung, Brady Thomas J, Hoffmann Udo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2006 Mar;57(3):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.019. Epub 2006 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sixteen-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) permits reliable noninvasive detection of significant coronary stenosis based on qualitative visual assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of MDCT to quantify the degree of coronary stenosis as compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) using two different reconstruction methods.

METHODS

We studied 69 coronary artery lesions from 38 consecutive patients that underwent 16-slice MDCT as a part of research study, which enrolled consecutive subjects scheduled for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography. Nine coronary artery lesions with motion artifacts, heavily calcified plaques or stents were excluded from the analysis. The degree of stenosis was calculated by two independent readers non-blinded to the location of the stenosis, but blinded to the results of the QCA. MDCT luminal diameters were measured in cross-sectional multi-planar reformatted (CS-MPR) images created perpendicular to the centerline of the vessel and in 5 mm thin-slab maximum intensity projections (MIP) parallel to the long axis of the vessel. Both MDCT methods were compared against QCA.

RESULTS

The mean degree of stenosis as measured by MDCT was closely correlated to QCA for both methods (CS-MPR versus QCA: 61 +/- 23% versus 64 +/- 29%; r2 = 0.83, p < 0.001 and MIP versus QCA: 64 +/- 22% versus 64 +/- 29%; r2 = 0.84, p < 0.001 for MIP. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a negative bias of the degree of stenosis of -2.8 +/- 12% using CS-MPR and a minimally positive bias of 0.6 +/- 12% for MIP. In stratified analysis for lesion severity (mild, 0-40%; moderate, 41-70% or severe, > 70%) the agreement between both CS-MPR and MIP was high when compared to QCA (kappa = 0.74 and 0.71, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Multi-detector spiral CT permits accurate quantitative assessment of the degree of coronary stenosis in selected data sets of sufficient quality using both cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.

摘要

背景

16层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)能够基于定性视觉评估对显著冠状动脉狭窄进行可靠的无创检测。本研究的目的是确定与定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)相比,MDCT使用两种不同重建方法对冠状动脉狭窄程度进行量化的准确性。

方法

我们研究了38例连续患者的69处冠状动脉病变,这些患者作为一项研究的一部分接受了16层MDCT检查,该研究纳入了计划进行临床指征性有创冠状动脉造影的连续受试者。分析中排除了9处有运动伪影、严重钙化斑块或支架的冠状动脉病变。由两名独立阅片者计算狭窄程度,阅片者知晓狭窄位置但不知QCA结果。在垂直于血管中心线创建的横断面多平面重组(CS-MPR)图像以及平行于血管长轴的5毫米薄层最大密度投影(MIP)图像中测量MDCT管腔直径。将两种MDCT方法与QCA进行比较。

结果

两种方法通过MDCT测量的平均狭窄程度与QCA密切相关(CS-MPR与QCA:61±23%对64±29%;r2 = 0.83,p < 0.001;MIP与QCA:64±22%对64±29%;MIP的r2 = 0.84,p < 0.001)。Bland-Altman分析显示,使用CS-MPR时狭窄程度的负偏差为−2.8±12%,使用MIP时最小正偏差为0.6±12%。在病变严重程度分层分析(轻度,0 - 40%;中度,41 - 70%或重度,> 70%)中,与QCA相比,CS-MPR和MIP之间的一致性都很高(kappa分别为0.74和0.71)。

结论

多排螺旋CT能够使用横断面和纵向血管重建对选定的足够质量的数据集中的冠状动脉狭窄程度进行准确的定量评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验