Gray Muir, Meakins Jonathan L
Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;86(1):217-20. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.11.005.
Evidence-based medicine provides a well-developed framework for evaluation of clinical research. Well-designed and adequately powered randomized controlled trials provide the best information on therapeutic efficacy; however, extrapolation of the trials' conclusions to individual patients may be difficult, and for many important surgical problems, trial data are unavailable. A complementary approach of inferential decision-making helps address these limitations, and increases the clinician's confidence in the safety of an approach of unknown efficacy. Experience establishes norms and expectations, and emphasizes events that are uncommon but clinically important. Although it cannot eliminate uncertainty or controversy, the integration of analytic techniques of evidence, inference, and experience provides the surgeon with the best means of adapting treatment to the unique circumstances of the individual patient.
循证医学为临床研究评估提供了完善的框架。设计良好且样本量充足的随机对照试验能提供关于治疗效果的最佳信息;然而,将试验结论外推至个体患者可能存在困难,而且对于许多重要的外科问题,尚无试验数据可用。一种辅助的推理决策方法有助于解决这些局限性,并增强临床医生对疗效未知的治疗方法安全性的信心。经验确立了规范和预期,并强调了虽不常见但具有临床重要性的事件。尽管它无法消除不确定性或争议,但将证据分析技术、推理和经验相结合,为外科医生提供了根据个体患者的独特情况调整治疗方案的最佳方法。