Prins Judith B, van der Meer Jos W M, Bleijenberg Gijs
Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):346-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68073-2.
During the past two decades, there has been heated debate about chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) among researchers, practitioners, and patients. Few illnesses have been discussed so extensively. The existence of the disorder has been questioned, its underlying pathophysiology debated, and an effective treatment opposed; patients' organisations have participated in scientific discussions. In this review, we look back on several controversies over CFS with respect to its definition, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. We review issues of epidemiology and clinical manifestations, focusing on the scientific status of CFS. Modern neuroscience and genetics research offer interesting findings for new hypotheses on the aetiology and pathogenesis of the illness. We also discuss promising future issues, such as psychopathophysiology and mechanisms of improvement, and suggest multidisciplinary prospective studies of CFS and fatigue in the general population. These studies should pay particular attention to similarities to and differences from functional somatic syndromes and other fatiguing conditions.
在过去二十年里,研究人员、从业者和患者之间就慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)展开了激烈辩论。很少有疾病受到如此广泛的讨论。该病症的存在受到质疑,其潜在病理生理学存在争议,有效治疗方法也遭到反对;患者组织参与了科学讨论。在本综述中,我们回顾了关于CFS在定义、诊断、病理生理学和治疗方面的若干争议。我们审视了流行病学和临床表现问题,重点关注CFS的科学现状。现代神经科学和遗传学研究为该疾病的病因学和发病机制的新假说提供了有趣的发现。我们还讨论了诸如心理病理生理学和改善机制等有前景的未来问题,并建议对普通人群中的CFS和疲劳进行多学科前瞻性研究。这些研究应特别关注与功能性躯体综合征及其他疲劳状况的异同。