导师的手部卫生习惯会影响学生的手部卫生率。
Mentor's hand hygiene practices influence student's hand hygiene rates.
作者信息
Snow Michelle, White George L, Alder Stephen C, Stanford Joseph B
机构信息
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, USA.
出版信息
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Feb;34(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.05.009.
BACKGROUND
There were 3 objectives for this prospective quasiexperimental study. The first was to determine the effect of mentor's hand hygiene practices on student's hand hygiene rates during clinical rotations. The second was to assess the difference in hand hygiene rates for students with and without prior medical experience. The third was to assess the student's opinion and beliefs regarding hand hygiene.
METHODS
Sixty students enrolled in a certified nursing program were selected to participate in the study. Each study group was observed twice during the 30-day span. The first observational period was conducted on day 1 of clinical rotation. The second observational period was conducted on day 30 of clinical rotation. Students were observed for hand hygiene. Also assessed were medical experience, sex, gloving, age, and mentor's hand hygiene practices. After observational period 2, a brief questionnaire was given to students to determine their opinion and beliefs regarding hand hygiene. The questionnaire was divided into 5 sections: student's commitment to hand hygiene, their perception of hand hygiene inconvenience, the necessity of hand hygiene, the student's ability to perform hand hygiene, and their opinion on the frequency of medical staff's hand hygiene.
RESULTS
The mentor's practice of hand hygiene was the strongest predictor of the student's rate of hand hygiene for both observational periods (P < .01). Furthermore, students without prior medical experience had a significant increase in hand hygiene rates when comparing observational period 1 to observational period 2 (P < .01). Glove usage was associated with increased hand hygiene rates by 50% during observational period 1 (P = .01) and 44% during observational period 2 (P < .01). Male students during observational period 1 practiced hand hygiene 30% less often than female students (P < .01); however, during observational period 2, there was no significant difference between hand hygiene rates for males and females (P = .82). Questionnaires were completed by 47 students, who reported a strong commitment to hand hygiene, belief in its necessity, and ability to perform hand hygiene (with scores in the high 90s on a 10 to 100 rating scale).
CONCLUSION
Mentor's use of hand hygiene and glove usage was associated with increased hand hygiene among students. Even though students reported strongly positive attitudes toward hand hygiene, students had a low overall rate of hand hygiene.
背景
这项前瞻性半实验性研究有3个目标。第一个目标是确定带教老师的手卫生习惯对学生临床实习期间手卫生率的影响。第二个目标是评估有无医学经验的学生在手卫生率方面的差异。第三个目标是评估学生对手卫生的看法和信念。
方法
选取60名参加护理认证项目的学生参与研究。在30天的时间跨度内,每个研究组被观察两次。第一次观察期在临床实习的第1天进行。第二次观察期在临床实习的第30天进行。观察学生的手卫生情况。同时评估医学经验、性别、戴手套情况、年龄和带教老师的手卫生习惯。在观察期2结束后,向学生发放一份简短问卷,以确定他们对手卫生的看法和信念。问卷分为5个部分:学生对手卫生的承诺、他们对手卫生不便之处的认知、手卫生的必要性、学生进行手卫生的能力以及他们对医务人员手卫生频率的看法。
结果
在两个观察期内带教老师的手卫生习惯都是学生手卫生率的最强预测因素(P <.01)。此外,与观察期1相比,无医学经验的学生在观察期2的手卫生率有显著提高(P <.01)。在观察期1,戴手套与手卫生率提高50%相关(P =.01),在观察期2与手卫生率提高44%相关(P <.01)。在观察期1,男学生进行手卫生的频率比女学生低30%(P <.01);然而,在观察期2,男女生的手卫生率没有显著差异(P =.82)。47名学生完成了问卷,他们报告对手卫生有坚定的承诺、相信其必要性并且有进行手卫生的能力(在10至100分的评分量表上得分在90多分)。
结论
带教老师的手卫生习惯和戴手套情况与学生手卫生率的提高相关。尽管学生报告对手卫生持非常积极的态度,但学生总体手卫生率较低。