Madden Caoimhe, Lydon Sinéad, Walsh Chloe, O'Dowd Emily, Fox Susan, Vellinga Akke, Lambe Kathryn, Tujjar Omar, Greally Cathriona, Power Michael, Bates John, O'Connor Paul
Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation.
J Infect Prev. 2021 Nov;22(6):252-258. doi: 10.1177/17571774211033351. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
Although appropriate hand hygiene (HH) practices are recognised as the most effective preventative strategy for infection, adherence is suboptimal. Previous studies in intensive care units (ICUs) have found differences in HH compliance between those moments that protect the patient, and those that protect the healthcare provider. However, such studies did not control for other variables known to impact HH compliance.
To examine HH among healthcare workers (HCWs) in ICU settings, and identify whether there is a statistical difference in HH compliance between patient-protective and self-protective moments, while controlling for other variables known to influence HH compliance (i.e. professional role, unit and shift time).
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in four ICUs across three Irish hospitals. Compliance was assessed according to the WHO's 'five moments for hand hygiene'. HCW professional role, total number of 'opportunities' for HH and whether compliance was achieved were recorded.
A total of 712 HH opportunities were recorded, with an overall compliance rate of 56.9%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that physicians, allied healthcare professionals and auxiliary staff were less likely than nurses to engage in HH. HCWs were more likely to comply during night shifts compared to morning shifts, and with self-protective as compared to patient-protective HH moments.
The information provided in this study provides a data-driven approach that ICUs can use to tailor HH interventions to where, when and for whom they are most required.
尽管适当的手卫生(HH)措施被认为是预防感染最有效的策略,但依从性并不理想。先前在重症监护病房(ICU)进行的研究发现,在保护患者的时刻和保护医护人员的时刻之间,HH的依从性存在差异。然而,此类研究并未控制其他已知会影响HH依从性的变量。
研究ICU环境中医护人员(HCW)的HH情况,并确定在控制其他已知会影响HH依从性的变量(即专业角色、科室和轮班时间)的情况下,患者保护时刻和自我保护时刻之间的HH依从性是否存在统计学差异。
在爱尔兰三家医院的四个ICU进行了一项横断面观察研究。根据世界卫生组织的“手卫生五个时刻”评估依从性。记录HCW的专业角色、HH的“机会”总数以及是否实现了依从性。
共记录了712次HH机会,总体依从率为56.9%。逻辑回归分析显示,医生、专职医疗人员和辅助人员比护士进行HH的可能性更小。与早班相比,HCW在夜班时更有可能依从,与患者保护时刻相比,在自我保护时刻更有可能依从。
本研究提供的信息提供了一种数据驱动的方法,ICU可以利用该方法针对最需要的地点、时间和人群调整HH干预措施。