Ayala Julio E, Bracy Deanna P, McGuinness Owen P, Wasserman David H
Vanderbilt-NIDDK (National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Diabetes. 2006 Feb;55(2):390-7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-0686.
Despite increased use of the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to study insulin action in mice, the effects of experimental parameters on the results obtained have not been addressed. In our studies, we determined the influences of sampling sites, fasting duration, and insulin delivery on results obtained from clamps in conscious mice. Carotid artery and jugular vein catheters were implanted in C57BL/6J mice (n = 6-10/group) fed a normal diet for sampling and infusions. After a 5-day recovery period, mice underwent a 120-min clamp (2.5-mU . kg(-1) . min(-1) insulin infusion; approximately 120-130 mg/dl glucose) while receiving [3-(3)H]glucose to determine glucose appearance (endoR(a)) and disappearance (R(d)). Sampling large volumes (approximately 100 mul) from the cut tail resulted in elevated catecholamines and basal glucose compared with artery sampling. Catecholamines were not elevated when taking small samples ( approximately 5 mul) from the cut tail. Overnight (18-h) fasting resulted in greater loss of total body, lean, and fat masses and hepatic glycogen but resulted in enhanced insulin sensitivity compared with 5-h fasting. Compared with a 16-mU/kg insulin prime, a 300-mU/kg prime resulted in hepatic insulin resistance and slower acquisition of steady-state glucose infusion rates (GIR) after a 5-h fast. The steady-state GIR was expedited after the 300-mU/kg prime in 18-h-fasted mice. The GIR and R(d) rose with increasing insulin infusions (0.8, 2.5, 4, and 20 mU . kg(-1) . min(-1)), but endoR(a) was fully suppressed with doses higher than 0.8 mU . kg(-1) . min(-1). Thus, common variations in experimental factors yield different results and should be considered in designing and interpreting clamps.
尽管高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹技术在研究小鼠胰岛素作用中的应用日益增多,但实验参数对所得结果的影响尚未得到探讨。在我们的研究中,我们确定了采样部位、禁食时间和胰岛素输注对清醒小鼠钳夹实验结果的影响。将颈动脉和颈静脉导管植入喂食正常饮食的C57BL/6J小鼠(每组n = 6 - 10只)体内,用于采样和输注。经过5天的恢复期后,小鼠接受120分钟的钳夹实验(胰岛素输注速率为2.5 mU·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹;血糖浓度约为120 - 130 mg/dl),同时给予[3-(³)H]葡萄糖以测定葡萄糖的生成率(endoR(a))和消失率(R(d))。与动脉采样相比,从断尾处采集大量样本(约100 μl)会导致儿茶酚胺水平升高和基础血糖升高。从断尾处采集少量样本(约5 μl)时,儿茶酚胺水平不会升高。与5小时禁食相比,过夜(18小时)禁食导致总体重、瘦体重和脂肪量以及肝糖原的损失更大,但胰岛素敏感性增强。与16 mU/kg胰岛素负荷剂量相比,300 mU/kg负荷剂量在5小时禁食后导致肝脏胰岛素抵抗,并使稳态葡萄糖输注率(GIR)的获取速度减慢。在18小时禁食的小鼠中,300 mU/kg负荷剂量后稳态GIR加快。GIR和R(d)随胰岛素输注速率增加(0.8、2.5、4和20 mU·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)而升高,但当剂量高于0.8 mU·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹时,endoR(a)被完全抑制。因此,实验因素的常见变化会产生不同的结果,在设计和解释钳夹实验时应予以考虑。