Hertel Jay, Olmsted-Kramer Lauren C
Kinesiology Program, University of Virginia, 210 Emmet Street South, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Gait Posture. 2007 Jan;25(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
Our purpose was to examine postural control in single leg stance in subjects with and without unilateral chronic ankle instability (CAI) using traditional center of pressure (COP)-based and time-to-boundary (TTB) measures. Fifteen physically active females with self-reported unilateral chronic ankle instability (CAI) and nine healthy female controls performed three 10-s trials of eyes open single limb quiet standing on a force plate on both their legs. The traditional measures were mean COP velocity, standard deviation of COP, range of COP, and percent of available range utilized. The TTB measures were absolute minimum TTB, mean of the minimum TTB samples, and standard deviation of the minimum TTB samples. All measures were calculated in both the mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions. A 2x2 group (CAI, control) by side (involved, uninvolved) design was utilized. The CAI group had significantly lower scores for five of the six TTB measures compared to the control group, however only one (AP COP velocity) of the eight traditional measures was different between groups. The TTB measures appear to detect postural control deficits related to CAI that traditional measures do not.
我们的目的是使用基于传统压力中心(COP)和边界时间(TTB)的测量方法,研究患有和未患有单侧慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)的受试者在单腿站立时的姿势控制情况。15名自我报告患有单侧慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)的体力活动女性和9名健康女性对照者,在测力平台上进行了三次10秒的睁眼单腿安静站立试验,双腿均参与。传统测量指标包括平均COP速度、COP标准差、COP范围以及所利用的可用范围百分比。TTB测量指标包括绝对最小TTB、最小TTB样本的均值以及最小TTB样本的标准差。所有测量指标均在内外侧(ML)和前后方向(AP)上进行计算。采用2×2组(CAI、对照)×侧(患侧、健侧)设计。与对照组相比,CAI组在六个TTB测量指标中的五个上得分显著更低,然而,两组之间八项传统测量指标中只有一项(AP COP速度)存在差异。TTB测量指标似乎能够检测出传统测量指标无法检测到的与CAI相关的姿势控制缺陷。