Winslow Robert D, Pinney Sean, Fuster Valentin
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Feb;3(2):86-93. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0450.
Heart failure is a deadly disease. Every year, tens of thousands of patients die from this condition, many of them suddenly. Efforts aimed at reducing mortality centered initially on antagonizing the neurohormonal system, which is maladaptively upregulated in response to myocardial failure. Antagonists of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and adrenergic nervous systems have reduced the rates of cardiovascular mortality and sudden cardiac death. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy has not fared as well. Consequently, efforts to reduce the risk of sudden death have focused on the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). How best to identify patients who will benefit from this invasive and expensive therapy has yet to be clearly determined. In this review, we discuss the effectiveness of ICDs in primary and secondary prevention of sudden death in heart failure patients, and examine the impact that the use of ICDs has had on clinical decision making.
心力衰竭是一种致命疾病。每年,数以万计的患者死于这种疾病,其中许多人猝死。最初,旨在降低死亡率的努力集中在拮抗神经激素系统上,该系统在心肌衰竭时会发生适应性上调。肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统和肾上腺素能神经系统的拮抗剂降低了心血管死亡率和心源性猝死率。抗心律失常药物治疗效果则欠佳。因此,降低猝死风险的努力集中在使用植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)上。如何最好地识别将从这种侵入性且昂贵的治疗中获益的患者,尚未明确确定。在本综述中,我们讨论了ICD在心力衰竭患者猝死一级和二级预防中的有效性,并探讨了ICD的使用对临床决策的影响。