Rosanio Salvatore, Schwarz Ernst R, Vitarelli Antonio, Zarraga Ignatius Gerardo E, Kunapuli Sanjay, Ware David L, Birnbaum Yochai, Tuero Enrique, Uretsky Barry F
The Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0553, United States.
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 31;119(3):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.021. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of mortality in heart failure (HF). Today the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has become a commonplace therapy around the world for patients with both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction (EF) < or = 35%. However, EF alone does not discriminate between the modes of death from HF (sudden arrhythmic death vs. non-sudden death). Other risk statifiers, such as electrophysiologic study and microvolt T-wave alternans testing, should therefore be used in the appropriate settings to minimize the number of unnecessary device implants. In addition, left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony has now become recognized as an additional major marker of cardiac mortality. Its assessment should entail echocardiography rather than measurement of the QRS duration. This will allow us to better integrate the ability of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in enhancing cardiac function with the ability of an ICD in preventing SCD. This review aims to: 1) give a synthesis of the published evidence regarding the value of implantable ICDs and CRT in the primary prophylaxis of SCD in HF; 2) discuss controversial clinical issues in this area; and 3) recommend practical device-based management strategies.
心脏性猝死(SCD)是心力衰竭(HF)患者死亡的主要原因。如今,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)已成为全球范围内针对缺血性和非缺血性心肌病且射血分数(EF)≤35%患者的常见治疗手段。然而,仅凭EF无法区分HF的死亡方式(心律失常性猝死与非猝死)。因此,在适当情况下应使用其他风险评估指标,如电生理检查和微伏级T波交替试验,以尽量减少不必要的设备植入数量。此外,左心室机械不同步现已被确认为心脏死亡的另一个主要标志物。对其评估应采用超声心动图而非QRS时限测量。这将使我们能够更好地将心脏再同步治疗(CRT)增强心脏功能的能力与ICD预防SCD的能力相结合。本综述旨在:1)综合已发表的关于植入式ICD和CRT在HF患者SCD一级预防中的价值的证据;2)讨论该领域存在争议的临床问题;3)推荐基于设备的实用管理策略。