Reiling B A, Rouse G H, Duello D A
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011.
J Anim Sci. 1992 Jul;70(7):2151-8. doi: 10.2527/1992.7072151x.
Over the past 3 yr, 100 carcasses (64 steers, 24 bulls, and 12 heifers) were fabricated into closely trimmed (6 mm maximum fat cover), boxed beef and further evaluated for percentage of retail yield at the Iowa State University Meat Laboratory. Hot carcass weight ranged from 235 to 399 kg with a least squares mean (LSM) and standard error across all sex classes of 318 +/- 3 kg. Additionally, fat cover ranged from .30 to 1.78 cm with an average of .91 +/- .05 cm. The LSM for longissimus muscle area (LMA) across all sex classes was 81.6 +/- 1.0 cm2. Bulls had significantly less subcutaneous fat (P less than .01) and greater LMA (P less than .01) than did either steers or heifers. Retail yield from the boxed chuck, expressed as a percentage of cold carcass weight, was 19.2 for bulls and 14.8 for steers. This difference was due primarily to a reduction of intermuscular fat. Similarly, bulls had a greater yield (P less than .01) of the boxed round than did steers. When cattle of differing frame sizes were compared, only percentage of retail yield of the boxed round was significant (P less than .01): large-framed cattle yielded 14.3 +/- .2%, compared with 12.8 +/- .2% for the small-framed cattle. When all possible regression analyses were run, sex class differences accounted for 25.7% of the variation in retail yield. The current USDA retail yield equation accounted for only 37.2% of the variation. Percentage of closely trimmed, boneless round had an R2-value of .57.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在过去3年里,100具牛胴体(64头阉牛、24头公牛和12头小母牛)被加工成精修(最大脂肪层厚度6毫米)盒装牛肉,并在爱荷华州立大学肉类实验室进一步评估零售产量百分比。热胴体重范围为235至399千克,所有性别类别的最小二乘均值(LSM)和标准误差为318±3千克。此外,脂肪层厚度范围为0.30至1.78厘米,平均为0.91±0.05厘米。所有性别类别的背最长肌面积(LMA)的LSM为81.6±1.0平方厘米。公牛的皮下脂肪显著少于阉牛和小母牛(P<0.01),LMA则显著大于阉牛和小母牛(P<0.01)。盒装肩胛肉的零售产量,以冷胴体重的百分比表示,公牛为19.2%,阉牛为14.8%。这种差异主要是由于肌间脂肪减少。同样地,公牛盒装后腿肉的产量高于阉牛(P<0.01)。当比较不同体格大小的牛时,只有盒装后腿肉的零售产量百分比有显著差异(P<0.01):大体格牛的产量为14.3±0.2%,而小体格牛为12.8±0.2%。进行所有可能的回归分析时,性别类别差异占零售产量变化的25.7%。美国农业部目前的零售产量方程仅占变化的37.2%。精修去骨后腿肉的百分比的R²值为0.57。(摘要截选至250字)