Sundar Shyam, Mehta Himanshu, Chhabra Amit, Singh Vikram, Chauhan Vineet, Desjeux Philippe, Rai Madhukar
Kala-Azar Medical Research Center, Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 1;42(5):608-13. doi: 10.1086/500138. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
In Bihar, India, where visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is hyperendemic and refractory to antimony, amphotericin B is the most effective option for the treatment of VL. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B are able to circumvent the toxic effect of conventional amphotericin B, and the total dose of these formulations can be administered over a short duration. However, cost is a major constraint in the use of lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD), which is a less expensive lipid formulation, has not been tested for the treatment of VL in India.
In an open-label, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 6-day course of ABCD administered to 3 different dose groups (total dose: 7.5 mg/kg [group A], 10 mg/kg [group B], and 15 mg/kg [group C]), each of which included a cohort of 135 patients.
Although infusion-related fever and chills occurred in 56%-68% of patients in the 3 different dose groups, 401 of 405 patients completed the treatment. All 135 patients in group A completed treatment, and the final cure rate for this group was 97%. In the group that received the highest dose of ABCD (group C), severe backache, an unusual side effect, was observed in 8 patients (5.92%). Serious adverse effects led to the withdrawal of 2 patients (1.48%) each from group B and group C.
Although the cost of ABCD is prohibitive, the high level of efficacy associated with short-term treatment with low-dose ABCD provides another alternative for the treatment of VL, especially in regions where VL is antimony refractory.
在印度比哈尔邦,内脏利什曼病(VL)高度流行且对锑剂耐药,两性霉素B是治疗VL最有效的选择。两性霉素B的脂质制剂能够规避传统两性霉素B的毒性作用,且这些制剂的总剂量可在短时间内给予。然而,成本是使用两性霉素B脂质制剂的主要限制因素。两性霉素B胶体分散液(ABCD)是一种较便宜的脂质制剂,尚未在印度进行治疗VL的试验。
在一项开放标签的随机临床试验中,我们评估了给予3个不同剂量组(总剂量:7.5mg/kg [A组]、10mg/kg [B组]和15mg/kg [C组])为期6天的ABCD疗程的疗效和安全性,每组包括135名患者。
尽管3个不同剂量组中56%-68%的患者出现了与输液相关的发热和寒战,但405名患者中有401名完成了治疗。A组的135名患者全部完成治疗,该组的最终治愈率为97%。在接受最高剂量ABCD的组(C组)中,8名患者(5.92%)出现了严重背痛这一异常副作用。严重不良反应导致B组和C组各有2名患者(1.48%)退出。
尽管ABCD的成本过高,但低剂量ABCD短期治疗所具有的高效性为VL的治疗提供了另一种选择,尤其是在VL对锑剂耐药的地区。