Pandis Nikolaos, Polychronopoulou Argyro, Eliades Theodore
Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Greece.
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):119-22. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0119:FROSAE]2.0.CO;2.
The purpose of this study was to comparatively assess the failure rate of self-ligating and edgewise brackets bonded with a self-etching adhesive and conventional phosphoric acid in patients followed for 12 months of active treatment. Sixty-two patients with complete permanent dentitions, similar treatment plans, and mechanotherapy were selected for the study. GAC Microarch edgewise brackets and ORMCO Damon2 brackets were bonded using a split mouth design, using the 3M Transbond Plus Self-etching primer (SEP) and Transbond XT paste; and conventional acid etching, with Orthosolo primer and Enlight paste, applied at an alternate sequence so that the adhesives were equally distributed on the maxillary and mandibular right and left quadrants. Data analysis was conducted with the use of logistic regression modeling. No difference in failure incidence was noted for either bracket-adhesive and mandibular or maxillary arch combinations, whereas a statistically significant difference was shown for right-sided appliances. On the basis of the results of this study, bonding of self-ligating brackets with SEP does not demonstrate higher probability for failure relative to standard bonding procedures and conventional brackets.
本研究的目的是比较评估在接受12个月积极治疗的患者中,使用自酸蚀粘结剂粘结的自锁托槽和方丝弓托槽与传统磷酸酸蚀托槽的失败率。选择62例全口恒牙列、治疗计划相似且采用机械疗法的患者进行研究。采用分口设计粘结GAC Microarch方丝弓托槽和ORMCO Damon2托槽,分别使用3M Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆(SEP)和Transbond XT糊剂;以及采用传统酸蚀法,使用Orthosolo底漆和Enlight糊剂,交替进行,使粘结剂在上颌和下颌的左右象限均匀分布。使用逻辑回归模型进行数据分析。对于任何托槽-粘结剂组合以及下颌或上颌牙弓,失败发生率均无差异,而右侧矫治器则显示出统计学上的显著差异。基于本研究结果,与标准粘结程序和传统托槽相比,使用SEP粘结自锁托槽并未显示出更高的失败概率。