Cal-Neto Julio P, Miguel José Augusto M, Zanella Eduardo
Department of Orthodontics, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):127-31. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0127:EOASPO]2.0.CO;2.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a self-etching primer (SEP) (Transbond Plus SEP, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) on shear bond strength of adhesive uncoated and precoated Victory brackets (3M Unitek). The sample group consisted of 23 patients, with four premolars each, equally divided in four different groups. Brackets were bonded in vivo by the same operator using a split-mouth random technique: group 1, 37% phosphoric acid + primer + composite + conventional Victory bracket; group 2, 37% phosphoric acid + primer + precoated Victory bracket; group 3, SEP + composite + conventional bracket; group 4, SEP + precoated bracket. After 30 days, premolars were extracted for orthodontic reasons and a Universal Instron Machine was used to apply an occlusal shear force directly to the enamel-bracket interface at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The groups were compared using two-way analysis of variance. Mean results and standard deviation for the groups were: group 1 = 11.60 +/- 2.65 Mpa, group 2 = 9.79 +/- 2.71 Mpa, group 3 = 10.75 +/- 2.67 Mpa, and group 4 = 10.31+/- 2.70 Mpa. No difference was observed between the conventional etching and primer or SEP (P = .948). However, significant differences in bond strength were present between the uncoated and precoated brackets (P = .032). Considering the values required to withstand normal orthodontic forces (8-9 Mpa), it could be concluded that the SEP combined with adhesive precoated brackets showed adequate shear bond strength and may be suitable for clinical use.
本研究的目的是评估自酸蚀底漆(SEP)(Transbond Plus SEP,3M Unitek公司,加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚)对未涂层和预涂层Victory托槽(3M Unitek公司)剪切粘结强度的影响。样本组由23名患者组成,每名患者有四颗前磨牙,平均分为四个不同的组。托槽由同一名操作者采用分口随机技术在体内粘结:第1组,37%磷酸+底漆+复合树脂+传统Victory托槽;第2组,37%磷酸+底漆+预涂层Victory托槽;第3组,SEP+复合树脂+传统托槽;第4组,SEP+预涂层托槽。30天后,因正畸原因拔除前磨牙,并使用万能Instron机器以0.5mm/min的速度直接在牙釉质-托槽界面施加咬合剪切力。采用双向方差分析对各组进行比较。各组的平均结果和标准差为:第1组=11.60±2.65MPa,第2组=9.79±2.71MPa,第3组=10.75±2.67MPa,第4组=10.31±2.