Nazarian Ramin, Starcevic Marta, Spencer Melissa J, Dell'Angelica Esteban C
Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Biochem J. 2006 May 1;395(3):587-98. doi: 10.1042/BJ20051965.
Dysbindin was identified as a dystrobrevin-binding protein potentially involved in the pathogenesis of muscular dystrophy. Subsequently, genetic studies have implicated variants of the human dysbindin-encoding gene, DTNBP1, in the pathogeneses of Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome and schizophrenia. The protein is a stable component of a multisubunit complex termed BLOC-1 (biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex-1). In the present study, the significance of the dystrobrevin-dysbindin interaction for BLOC-1 function was examined. Yeast two-hybrid analyses, and binding assays using recombinant proteins, demonstrated direct interaction involving coiled-coil-forming regions in both dysbindin and the dystrobrevins. However, recombinant proteins bearing the coiled-coil-forming regions of the dystrobrevins failed to bind endogenous BLOC-1 from HeLa cells or mouse brain or muscle, under conditions in which they bound the Dp71 isoform of dystrophin. Immunoprecipitation of endogenous dysbindin from brain or muscle resulted in robust co-immunoprecipitation of the pallidin subunit of BLOC-1 but no specific co-immunoprecipitation of dystrobrevin isoforms. Within BLOC-1, dysbindin is engaged in interactions with three other subunits, named pallidin, snapin and muted. We herein provide evidence that the same 69-residue region of dysbindin that is sufficient for dystrobrevin binding in vitro also contains the binding sites for pallidin and snapin, and at least part of the muted-binding interface. Functional, histological and immunohistochemical analyses failed to detect any sign of muscle pathology in BLOC-1-deficient, homozygous pallid mice. Taken together, these results suggest that dysbindin assembled into BLOC-1 is not a physiological binding partner of the dystrobrevins, likely due to engagement of its dystrobrevin-binding region in interactions with other subunits.
发动蛋白被鉴定为一种与肌营养不良蛋白结合的蛋白,可能参与了肌肉萎缩症的发病机制。随后,遗传学研究表明,人类发动蛋白编码基因DTNBP1的变异与Hermansky-Pudlak综合征和精神分裂症的发病机制有关。该蛋白是一种多亚基复合物(称为BLOC-1,即溶酶体相关细胞器生物合成复合物-1)的稳定成分。在本研究中,研究了肌营养不良蛋白与发动蛋白的相互作用对BLOC-1功能的重要性。酵母双杂交分析以及使用重组蛋白的结合试验表明,发动蛋白和肌营养不良蛋白中形成卷曲螺旋的区域之间存在直接相互作用。然而,带有肌营养不良蛋白卷曲螺旋形成区域的重组蛋白在能够结合肌营养不良蛋白的Dp71异构体的条件下,却无法结合来自HeLa细胞、小鼠脑或肌肉的内源性BLOC-1。从脑或肌肉中对内源性发动蛋白进行免疫沉淀,会导致BLOC-1的苍白蛋白亚基大量共免疫沉淀,但不会导致肌营养不良蛋白异构体的特异性共免疫沉淀。在BLOC-1中,发动蛋白与其他三个亚基相互作用,这三个亚基分别称为苍白蛋白、小突触结合蛋白和沉默蛋白。我们在此提供证据表明,发动蛋白在体外足以与肌营养不良蛋白结合的相同的69个氨基酸区域,也包含与苍白蛋白和小突触结合蛋白的结合位点,以及至少部分与沉默蛋白的结合界面。功能、组织学和免疫组织化学分析未能在BLOC-1缺陷的纯合苍白小鼠中检测到任何肌肉病变的迹象。综上所述,这些结果表明,组装到BLOC-1中的发动蛋白不是肌营养不良蛋白的生理结合伴侣,这可能是由于其与肌营养不良蛋白结合的区域参与了与其他亚基的相互作用。