Martins Reinaldo M, Galler Ricardo, Freire Marcos Silva, Camacho Luiz Antonio B, de Lourdes S Maia Maria, Homma Akira
Vaccine. 2007 Jan 2;25(1):10-1. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.12.052. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
In a recently published article in this journal, Massad et al. contraindicates yellow fever vaccination to persons 60 years or older, considering that the risk of serious adverse events is higher for this age class. The conclusion was based on the input of available data on age-related probabilities of developing serious adverse events in the United States, as well on other data not firmly established. We consider such contraindication inadequate, because the data input has limitations, higher letality of wild-type yellow fever infection in older adults, risk of introduction of yellow fever by travelers into new countries, lower risk of vaccine adverse events in revaccinated or immune people in endemic countries, and the experience of Brazil, with only one suspect case of associated viscerotropic disease in an individual older than 60 years. The model proposed by Massad et al. is useful but can lead to different conclusions, depending on the epidemiological context and individual risk profile.
在本期刊最近发表的一篇文章中,马萨德等人指出60岁及以上人群禁忌接种黄热病疫苗,理由是该年龄组发生严重不良事件的风险更高。这一结论是基于美国关于发生严重不良事件的年龄相关概率的现有数据输入,以及其他尚未确凿证实的数据。我们认为这种禁忌并不充分,因为数据输入存在局限性,老年人野生型黄热病感染的致死率更高,旅行者将黄热病传入新国家的风险,在流行国家再次接种或免疫人群中疫苗不良事件的风险较低,以及巴西的经验,该国60岁以上个体中仅有1例疑似相关嗜内脏型疾病病例。马萨德等人提出的模型是有用的,但根据流行病学背景和个体风险状况可能会得出不同结论。