Grossman Daniel, Ellertson Charlotte, Abuabara Katrina, Blanchard Kelly, Rivas Francisco T
Ibis Reproductive Health, 2 Brattle Square, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):791-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.040774. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
Many contraceptives are encumbered with potentially unnecessary restrictions on their use. Indeed, fear of side effects, fostered by alarmist labeling, is a leading reason that women do not use contraceptives. In the United States, hormonal methods currently require a prescription, although research suggests that women can adequately screen themselves for contraindications, manage side effects, and determine an appropriate initiation date, leaving little need for routine direct physician involvement. Sizing, spermicidal use, and length-of-wear limits burden users of cervical barriers and may be unnecessary. Despite recent changes in the labeling of intrauterine devices, clinicians commonly restrict use of this method and in some countries may limit the types of providers authorized to insert them. Although in some cases additional research is necessary, existing data indicate that evidence-based demedicalization of contraceptive provision could reduce costs and improve access.
许多避孕方法在使用上存在潜在的不必要限制。事实上,危言耸听的标签引发的对副作用的恐惧,是女性不使用避孕方法的主要原因。在美国,激素类避孕方法目前需要处方,尽管研究表明女性能够自行充分筛查禁忌证、应对副作用并确定合适的开始使用日期,几乎无需医生进行常规直接干预。尺寸、杀精剂使用以及佩戴时长限制给宫颈屏障使用者带来负担,可能并无必要。尽管宫内节育器的标签最近有所变化,但临床医生通常会限制该方法的使用,在一些国家可能还会限制有权插入宫内节育器的医疗服务提供者类型。虽然在某些情况下需要进一步研究,但现有数据表明,基于证据的避孕服务去医学化可以降低成本并改善可及性。