Dimopoulos Stavros, Anastasiou-Nana Maria, Sakellariou Dimitrios, Drakos Stavros, Kapsimalakou Smaragdo, Maroulidis George, Roditis Petros, Papazachou Ourania, Vogiatzis Ioannis, Roussos Charis, Nanas Serafim
Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine Department, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Evgenidio Hospital, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Greece.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006 Feb;13(1):67-73. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000198449.20775.7c.
Heart rate recovery (HRR1) immediately after exercise reflects parasympathetic activity, which is markedly attenuated in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. The aim of our study was to examine both continuous and interval exercise training effects on HRR1 in these patients.
The population study consisted of 29 stable CHF patients that participated at a rehabilitation program of 36 sessions, three times per week. Of the 29 patients, 24 completed the program. Patients were randomly assigned to interval {n=10 [100% peak work rate (WRp) for 30 s, alternating with rest for 30 s]} and to continuous training [n=14 (50%WRp)].
All patients performed a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer before and after the completion of the program. Measurements included peak oxygen uptake (VO2p), anaerobic threshold (AT), WRp, first degree slope of VO2 during the first minute of recovery (VO2/t-slope), chronotropic response [% chronotropic reserve (CR)=(peak HR - resting HR)x100/(220 - age - resting HR)], HRR1 (HR difference from peak exercise to one minute after).
After the completion of the rehabilitation program there was a significant increase of WRp, VO2p, AT and VO2/t-slope (by 30%, P=0.01; 6%, P=0.01; 10%, P=0.02; and 27%, P=0.03 respectively for continuous training and by 21%, P<0.05; 8%, P=0.01; 6%, P=NS; and 48%, P=0.02 respectively for interval training). However, only patients exercised under the continuous training regime had a significant increase in HRR1 (15.0+/-9.0 to 24.0+/-12 bpm; P=0.02) and CR (57+/-19 to 72+/-21%, P=0.02), in contrast with those assigned to interval training (HRR1: 21+/-11 to 21+/-8 bpm; P=NS and CR: 57+/-18 to 59+/-21%, P=NS).
Both continuous and interval exercise training program improves exercise capacity in CHF patients. However, continuous rather than interval exercise training improves early HRR1, a marker of parasympathetic activity, suggesting a greater contribution to the autonomic nervous system.
运动后即刻的心率恢复(HRR1)反映副交感神经活动,而慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的这种活动明显减弱。我们研究的目的是检验持续运动训练和间歇运动训练对这些患者HRR1的影响。
这项人群研究包括29名稳定的CHF患者,他们参加了一个为期36节、每周三次的康复计划。29名患者中,24名完成了该计划。患者被随机分为间歇训练组{n = 10 [以100%峰值工作率(WRp)运动30秒,交替休息30秒]}和持续训练组[n = 14(50%WRp)]。
所有患者在计划完成前后均在功率自行车上进行了症状限制性心肺运动试验。测量指标包括峰值摄氧量(VO2p)、无氧阈(AT)、WRp、恢复第一分钟内VO2的一阶斜率(VO2/t斜率)、变时性反应{[变时性储备百分比(CR)=(峰值心率 - 静息心率)×100/(220 - 年龄 - 静息心率)]}、HRR1(从峰值运动到运动后一分钟的心率差值)。
康复计划完成后,WRp、VO2p、AT和VO2/t斜率均显著增加(持续训练组分别增加30%,P = 0.01;6%,P = 0.01;10%,P = 0.02;27%,P = 0.03;间歇训练组分别增加21%,P < 0.05;8%,P = 0.01;6%,P = 无显著差异;48%,P = 0.02)。然而,只有持续训练组的患者HRR1(从15.0±9.0次/分钟增加到24.0±12次/分钟;P = 0.02)和CR(从57±19%增加到72±21%,P = 0.02)显著增加,而间歇训练组患者(HRR1:从21±11次/分钟增加到21±8次/分钟;P = 无显著差异,CR:从57±18%增加到59±21%,P = 无显著差异)则无明显变化。
持续运动训练和间歇运动训练计划均可提高CHF患者的运动能力。然而,持续运动训练而非间歇运动训练可改善早期HRR1,即副交感神经活动的标志物,这表明其对自主神经系统的贡献更大。