Suppr超能文献

COGA 中复制的单核苷酸多态性基因型的特征:Affymetrix 和遗传性疾病研究中心。

Characteristics of replicated single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes from COGA: Affymetrix and Center for Inherited Disease Research.

机构信息

Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA.

出版信息

BMC Genet. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S154.

Abstract

Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 provided re-genotyped single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Specifically, both Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) and Affymetrix genotyped the same 11,560 SNPs from the Affymetrix GeneChip Mapping 10K Array marker set on the same 184 individuals from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism database. While the inconsistency rate between CIDR and Affymetrix (two different genotypes for the same subject) was low (0.2%), the non-replication rate (two different genotypes for the same subject or one identified genotype and one missing genotype) was substantial (9.5%). The missing data could be from no-call regions, which is inconsistent with recent recommendations about the use of no-call regions in association tests. In addition, no-call regions would suggest that the actual inconsistency rate is higher than reported. A high inconsistency rate has significant impact on power in related hypothesis tests. In addition, the data are consistent with assumptions made in a recently proposed likelihood ratio test of association for re-genotyped data.

摘要

遗传分析研讨会 14 提供了重新基因分型的单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 数据。具体来说,CIDR 和 Affymetrix 都对来自酒精遗传协作研究数据库的 184 名个体的 Affymetrix GeneChip Mapping 10K Array 标记集中的 11560 个 SNP 进行了基因分型。虽然 CIDR 和 Affymetrix(同一主题的两种不同基因型)之间的不一致率较低(0.2%),但非复制率(同一主题的两种不同基因型或一种确定的基因型和一种缺失的基因型)相当高(9.5%)。缺失的数据可能来自无呼叫区域,这与最近关于在关联测试中使用无呼叫区域的建议不一致。此外,无呼叫区域表明实际的不一致率高于报告的不一致率。高不一致率对相关假设检验的功效有重大影响。此外,这些数据与最近提出的用于重新基因分型数据关联的似然比检验的假设一致。

相似文献

2
Genotyping errors, pedigree errors, and missing data.
Genet Epidemiol. 2005;29 Suppl 1:S120-4. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20120.
6
Genotyping and annotation of Affymetrix SNP arrays.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(14):e100. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl475. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
8
Estimating genotyping error rates from Mendelian errors in SNP array genotypes and their impact on inference.
Genomics. 2007 Sep;90(3):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
10
Dynamic model based algorithms for screening and genotyping over 100 K SNPs on oligonucleotide microarrays.
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):1958-63. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti275. Epub 2005 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the concordance between sequencing, imputation and microarray genotype calls in the GAW18 data.
BMC Proc. 2014 Jun 17;8(Suppl 1 Genetic Analysis Workshop 18Vanessa Olmo):S22. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S22. eCollection 2014.
2
Value of Mendelian laws of segregation in families: data quality control, imputation, and beyond.
Genet Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;38 Suppl 1(0 1):S21-8. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21821.
3
The cost-effectiveness of reclassification sampling for prevalence estimation.
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032058. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
4
Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
Hum Hered. 2011;72(3):153-60. doi: 10.1159/000332222. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
5
Reproducibility of Genotypes as Measured by the Affymetrix GeneChip® 100K Human Mapping Array Set.
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008 Aug 15;52(12):5367-5374. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.05.020.
6
Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2009;8(1):Article24. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1433. Epub 2009 May 5.
7
A novel tool for individual haplotype inference using mixed data.
J Biomed Sci. 2009 Jun 2;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-52.
8
The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.
Ann Hum Genet. 2009 May;73(Pt 3):370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00516.x. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
10
Testing linkage disequilibrium from pooled DNA: a contingency table perspective.
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 10;27(28):5801-15. doi: 10.1002/sim.3407.

本文引用的文献

2
A PROBABILITY MODEL FOR ERRORS OF CLASSIFICATON. II. PARTICULAR CASES.
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:129-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02289444.
3
A PROBABILITY MODEL FOR ERRORS OF CLASSIFICATION. I. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.
Psychometrika. 1965 Mar;30:73-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02289748.
4
FP-TDI SNP scoring by manual and statistical procedures: a study of error rates and types.
Biotechniques. 2003 Mar;34(3):610-6, 618-20, 622 passim. doi: 10.2144/03343dd04.
6
Genotyping by apyrase-mediated allele-specific extension.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Dec 15;29(24):E121. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.24.e121.
7
High-throughput genotyping with single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Genome Res. 2001 Jul;11(7):1262-8. doi: 10.1101/gr.157801.
8
Inference about misclassification probabilities from repeated binary responses.
Biometrics. 2000 Sep;56(3):706-11. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00706.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验