Suppr超能文献

从招募年轻女学生参与衣原体筛查随机对照试验中吸取的经验教训。

Lessons learned from recruiting young female students to a randomised controlled trial of chlamydia screening.

作者信息

Ivaz Stella, Brennan Sarah, Dean Sally, Hay Sima, Hay Phillip, Kerry Sally, Oakeshott Pippa

机构信息

Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2006 Apr;23(2):188-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi109. Epub 2006 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruitment is a problem in many trials. Two female medical students offered to help with recruiting problems in a community-based trial of chlamydia screening to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. We need to recruit 2500 sexually active female students and ask them to provide a self-taken low vaginal swab and complete a questionnaire with follow-up after a year.

OBJECTIVES

To identify recruitment difficulties in a community-based trial of chlamydia screening and to investigate how they might be overcome.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

London South Bank and Kingston Universities.

METHODS

The students observed the recruitment methods used for the first 4 months of the trial. This comprised single researchers recruiting individual women in student bars and common rooms. With the researchers they piloted a new method of group recruitment with pairs of researchers making announcements at the end of lectures after first sending out all male students and those aged>25 years. This involved extra time planning and liaising with the lecturers in advance of recruitment sessions.

RESULTS

The recruitment rate had been averaging only 25 participants per week. Many students were ineligible: never been sexually active, too old, recently been tested for chlamydia. Many eligible students were reluctant to take part because of embarrassment or anxiety about providing a swab. Using a new method of group recruitment after lectures we recruited 192 participants in 2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

For a study on a sensitive topic, two researchers recruiting women in groups after lectures may be a more effective and cost-effective way than individual recruitment by researchers working alone.

摘要

背景

在许多试验中,招募参与者都是一个难题。两名女医学生主动提出帮忙解决一项基于社区的衣原体筛查试验中的招募问题,该试验旨在预防盆腔炎。我们需要招募2500名有性行为的女学生,要求她们自行采集阴道下段拭子,并填写一份问卷,一年后进行随访。

目的

确定基于社区的衣原体筛查试验中的招募困难,并研究如何克服这些困难。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

伦敦南岸大学和金斯顿大学。

方法

这两名学生观察了试验前4个月所采用的招募方法。最初是由单个研究人员在学生酒吧和公共休息室招募女性。他们与研究人员一起试点了一种新的分组招募方法,即由两名研究人员搭档,在讲座结束时进行招募通知,前提是先让所有男学生以及年龄超过25岁的学生离场。这需要在招募活动前额外花费时间进行规划并与讲师联络。

结果

招募率平均每周仅25名参与者。许多学生不符合条件:从未有过性行为、年龄太大、近期已接受过衣原体检测。许多符合条件的学生因提供拭子感到尴尬或焦虑而不愿参与。采用讲座后分组招募的新方法,我们在两周内招募了192名参与者。

结论

对于一项关于敏感话题的研究,两名研究人员在讲座后分组招募女性可能比研究人员单独进行个人招募更有效且更具成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验