Gabbay Mark, Thomas Joanna
Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Aug;25(4):388-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.06.004.
While randomised controlled trials remain the accepted 'gold standard' in medical research, participant recruitment is often problematic, particularly with primary care trials or those requiring healthy volunteers. Such difficulties can jeopardise the trial, leading to early abandonment, reduced statistical power or timetable and budget overruns. Substantial changes in recruitment plans may reduce the generalisability of the research. In order to overcome some of the more common recruitment difficulties, it is important that researchers share their recruitment strategy successes and failures. We report our experience of recruiting healthy volunteers to a condom trial, based within primary care and community populations. This was an RCT of the effect that using an additional spermicidal lubricant has on condom failure. We originally aimed to recruit entirely from Family Planning Clinics, but eventually required a wide variety of strategies. Targeted mailings, newspaper coverage and electronic 'posters' were among the most successful we used to bolster clinic recruitment. Concerned at our slow recruitment rates, we conducted a questionnaire survey investigating the reasons for participation and non-participation in the research completed by 101 trial participants, 112 decliners and 90 controls (total 303). The most important reasons given for taking part included 'considering the research to be important' (85%), 'wanting to help the researchers' (70%), 'having time to help' (62%) and 'getting free condoms and lubricant' (56%). The most popular reasons for declining were 'not wanting to use condoms' (38%), 'partner's unwillingness to take part' (29%), 'not wanting to alter usual contraceptive practice' (27%), 'not having time' (21%). Contrary to expectations, embarrassment and fears about confidentiality were relatively unimportant factors in this decision. In conclusion, the key to attaining recruitment targets was the core research team taking an active part, working closely with clinic staff and maintaining tight control of the process. Altruism remains a powerful motivation for participants, supported by incentives and procedural details to minimise personal inconvenience. Even for intimate research topics, these general factors outweigh specific issues.
虽然随机对照试验仍然是医学研究中公认的“金标准”,但参与者招募往往存在问题,特别是在初级保健试验或那些需要健康志愿者的试验中。这些困难可能会危及试验,导致试验提前终止、统计效力降低或时间表和预算超支。招募计划的重大变化可能会降低研究的普遍性。为了克服一些更常见的招募困难,研究人员分享他们的招募策略的成功与失败是很重要的。我们报告了我们在初级保健和社区人群中招募健康志愿者参与一项避孕套试验的经验。这是一项关于使用额外杀精润滑剂对避孕套失败率影响的随机对照试验。我们最初的目标是完全从计划生育诊所招募,但最终需要多种策略。定向邮寄、报纸报道和电子“海报”是我们用于促进诊所招募的最成功的方法之一。由于担心招募速度缓慢,我们进行了一项问卷调查,调查了101名试验参与者、112名拒绝者和90名对照组(共303人)完成的参与和不参与研究的原因。参与的最重要原因包括“认为该研究很重要”(85%)、“想帮助研究人员”(70%)、“有时间帮忙”(62%)和“获得免费避孕套和润滑剂”(56%)。拒绝的最常见原因是“不想使用避孕套”(38%)、“伴侣不愿意参与”(29%)、“不想改变通常的避孕方式”(27%)、“没有时间”(21%)。与预期相反,尴尬和对保密性的担忧在这个决定中相对不太重要。总之,实现招募目标的关键是核心研究团队积极参与,与诊所工作人员密切合作并严格控制过程。利他主义仍然是参与者的强大动力,同时有激励措施和程序细节来尽量减少个人不便。即使是对于私密的研究主题,这些一般因素也比具体问题更重要。