Glenn R Edward, McCarty Eric C, Potter Hollis G, Juliao Saul F, Gordon Jeffrey D, Spindler Kurt P
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1084-93. doi: 10.1177/0363546505284846. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
Osteochondral autografts and allografts have been widely used in the treatment of isolated grade IV articular cartilage lesions of the knee. However, the authors are not aware of any study that has prospectively compared fresh osteochondral autografts to fresh allografts with regard to imaging, biomechanical testing, and histology.
The imaging, biomechanical properties, and histologic appearance of fresh osteochondral autograft and fresh allograft are similar with respect to bony incorporation into host bone, articular cartilage composition, and biomechanical properties.
Controlled laboratory study.
Eighteen adult dogs underwent bilateral knee osteochondral graft implantation after creation of an Outerbridge grade IV cartilage defect. One knee received an autograft, and the contralateral knee received a fresh allograft. Nine dogs were sacrificed at 3 months, and 9 dogs were sacrificed at 6 months. Graft analysis included gross examination, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, biomechanical testing, and histology.
Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated excellent bony incorporation of both autografts and allografts. Biomechanical testing demonstrated no significant difference between autografts versus allografts versus control at 3 or 6 months (P = .36-.91). A post hoc calculation showed 80% power to detect a 30% difference between allograft and control. Histologic examination showed normal cartilage structure for both autografts and allografts.
Fresh osteochondral autograft and fresh allograft tissues are not statistically different with respect to bony incorporation, articular cartilage composition, or biomechanical properties up to 6 months after implantation.
The use of fresh allograft tissue to treat osteochondral defects eliminates morbidity associated with harvesting autograft tissue without compromising the results of the surgical procedure.
骨软骨自体移植和异体移植已广泛应用于治疗膝关节孤立性IV级关节软骨损伤。然而,作者尚未发现有任何前瞻性研究对新鲜骨软骨自体移植和新鲜异体移植在影像学、生物力学测试和组织学方面进行比较。
新鲜骨软骨自体移植和新鲜异体移植在骨与宿主骨的融合、关节软骨组成和生物力学特性方面,其影像学、生物力学特性和组织学表现相似。
对照实验室研究。
18只成年犬在制造Outerbridge IV级软骨缺损后接受双侧膝关节骨软骨移植植入。一侧膝关节接受自体移植,对侧膝关节接受新鲜异体移植。9只犬在3个月时处死,9只犬在6个月时处死。移植分析包括大体检查、X线片、磁共振成像、生物力学测试和组织学检查。
磁共振成像显示自体移植和异体移植的骨融合均良好。生物力学测试显示,在3个月或6个月时,自体移植与异体移植与对照组之间无显著差异(P = 0.36 - 0.91)。事后计算显示,检测异体移植与对照组之间30%差异的效能为80%。组织学检查显示自体移植和异体移植的软骨结构均正常。
新鲜骨软骨自体移植和新鲜异体移植组织在植入后6个月内,在骨融合、关节软骨组成或生物力学特性方面无统计学差异。
使用新鲜异体移植组织治疗骨软骨缺损可消除与采集自体移植组织相关的发病率,而不影响手术效果。