Mueller Christine, Arling Greg, Kane Robert, Bershadsky Julie, Holland Diane, Joy Annika
University of Minnesota School of Nursing, 5-160 WDH, 308 Harvard Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Gerontologist. 2006 Feb;46(1):74-80. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.1.74.
This study reviews staffing standards from the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine if these standards are related to nursing home staffing levels.
Rules and regulations for states' nursing home staffing standards were obtained for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Nurse staffing data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting (known as OSCAR) database. The minimum hours per resident day (HPRD) staffing standards for each state were categorized according to the following: no state-specific HPRD standard (adheres only to federal staffing guidelines); low HPRD standard (< or = 2.5 HPRD); and high HPRD standard (> 2.5 HPRD). A series of hierarchical linear models examined the relationships between state staffing standards and actual facility staffing (total, licensed, and certified nurse aide HPRD), using a number of covariates.
The variance in facility staffing was much greater within than between states. Facilities in states with high staffing standards had somewhat higher staffing than states with no standards or low standards, whereas facility staffing in states with low standards was not significantly different from that in states with no standards. Other factors, such as resident acuity and average state Medicaid rate, also were related to staffing.
State staffing standards may not be effective policy tools because they are only one of many factors that affect facility staffing levels. Setting a low minimum HPRD standard may fail to raise staffing, or it may even have a dampening effect on staffing rates in facilities.
本研究回顾了50个州及哥伦比亚特区的人员配备标准,以确定这些标准是否与疗养院的人员配备水平相关。
获取了50个州及哥伦比亚特区关于疗养院人员配备标准的规章制度。护士人员配备数据来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的在线调查、认证及报告(简称OSCAR)数据库。每个州的每位居民每日最低护理时长(HPRD)人员配备标准按以下方式分类:无特定州HPRD标准(仅遵循联邦人员配备指南);低HPRD标准(≤2.5 HPRD);高HPRD标准(>2.5 HPRD)。一系列分层线性模型使用多个协变量,检验了州人员配备标准与实际机构人员配备(总计、持证及认证护士助理HPRD)之间的关系。
机构人员配备的差异在州内比州际之间大得多。人员配备标准高的州的机构人员配备略高于无标准或标准低的州,而标准低的州的机构人员配备与无标准的州没有显著差异。其他因素,如居民护理需求程度和州医疗补助平均费率,也与人员配备有关。
州人员配备标准可能不是有效的政策工具,因为它们只是影响机构人员配备水平的众多因素之一。设定较低的最低HPRD标准可能无法提高人员配备,甚至可能对机构的人员配备率产生抑制作用。