Suppr超能文献

痴呆症、护士人员配备与养老院的健康结果。

Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, iTEQC Research Program, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14270. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14270. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

A national sample of nursing homes during 2017-2019 (pre-COVID). Data included the Payroll-Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long-Term Care Focus.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long-term facility-level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident-day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Hospital-based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low-census dementia facilities, although, high- and low-dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low- and high-dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low- and high-dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low- and high-dementia census facilities.

摘要

目的

评估和对比低痴呆患者和高痴呆患者比例的养老院中护士人力与健康结果之间的关系,以了解与痴呆护理质量相关的人员配备时间。

数据来源和研究范围

2017-2019 年(COVID 前)全国范围内的养老院样本。数据包括工资单杂志、医疗保险索赔、养老院护理比较和长期护理焦点。

研究设计

回顾性回归分析。我们分别估计了预测六个长期设施水平结果的线性模型。自变量包括居民每天每小时的护理人员(HPRD)与设施中痴呆患者的比例之间的相互作用,同时控制了其他患者和设施的特征。

数据收集/提取方法:排除了医院附属养老院、痴呆患者比例低于 30%的养老院和缺失数据。

主要发现

我们发现,对于高痴呆和低痴呆设施,注册护士和认证护士助理的 HPRD 很可能在 HPRD 的大部分范围内表现出对结果的积极回报,尽管高和低痴呆设施在大多数结果率上都存在差异在所有人员配备水平。作为 HPRD 函数的平均预测抗精神病药物和日常生活活动在高痴呆设施中较差,独立活动和住院治疗没有显著差异,急诊室和压疮在低痴呆设施中较差。对于任何结果,高痴呆和低痴呆设施之间的平均边缘效应(CI 包括零)在统计学上没有差异。

结论

这些发现表明,增加人员配备将通过相似的增量改善所有结果在低和高痴呆设施中的结果。然而,在任何特定的人员配备水平下,低和高痴呆设施之间的结果仍然存在绝对差异,这表明仅增加人员配备不足以缩小这些差距。需要进一步研究,以确定低和高痴呆患者比例的设施在绩效方面改进的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0762/11250382/8622b7aac4f3/HESR-59-0-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验