Suppr超能文献

关节镜下肩袖修补术的生物力学评估:双排固定与单排固定的比较

Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation.

作者信息

Ma C Benjamin, Comerford Lyn, Wilson Joseph, Puttlitz Christian M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU 320W, San Francisco, CA 94143-0728, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):403-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02887.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs can have higher rates of failure than do open repairs. Current methods of rotator cuff repair have been limited to single-row fixation of simple and horizontal stitches, which is very different from open repairs. The objective of this study was to compare the initial cyclic loading and load-to-failure properties of double-row fixation with those of three commonly used single-row techniques.

METHODS

Ten paired human supraspinatus tendons were split in half, yielding four tendons per cadaver. The bone mineral content at the greater tuberosity was assessed. Four stitch configurations (two-simple, massive cuff, arthroscopic Mason-Allen, and double-row fixation) were randomized and tested on each set of tendons. Specimens were cyclically loaded between 5 and 100 N at 0.25 Hz for fifty cycles and then loaded to failure under displacement control at 1 mm/sec. Conditioning elongation, peak-to-peak elongation, ultimate tensile load, and stiffness were measured with use of a three-dimensional tracking system and compared, and the failure type (suture or anchor pull-out) was recorded.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found among the stitches with respect to conditioning elongation. The mean peak-to-peak elongation (and standard error of the mean) was significantly lower for the massive cuff (1.1 +/- 0.1 mm) and double-row stitches (1.1 +/- 0.1 mm) than for the arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitch (1.5 +/- 0.2 mm) (p < 0.05). The ultimate tensile load was significantly higher for double-row fixation (287 +/- 24 N) than for all of the single-row fixations (p < 0.05). Additionally, the massive cuff stitch (250 +/- 21 N) was found to have a significantly higher ultimate tensile load than the two-simple (191 +/- 18 N) and arthroscopic Mason-Allen (212 +/- 21 N) stitches (p < 0.05). No significant differences in stiffness were found among the stitches. Failure mechanisms were similar for all stitches. Rotator cuff repairs in the anterior half of the greater tuberosity had a significantly lower peak-to-peak elongation and higher ultimate tensile strength than did repairs on the posterior half.

CONCLUSIONS

In this in vitro cadaver study, double-row fixation had a significantly higher ultimate tensile load than the three types of single-row fixation stitches. Of the single-row fixations, the massive cuff stitch had cyclic and load-to-failure characteristics similar to the double-row fixation. Anterior repairs of the supraspinatus tendon had significantly stronger biomechanical behavior than posterior repairs.

摘要

背景

近期研究表明,与开放性修复相比,关节镜下肩袖修复的失败率可能更高。目前肩袖修复方法仅限于简单和水平缝线的单排固定,这与开放性修复有很大不同。本研究的目的是比较双排固定与三种常用单排技术的初始循环加载和失效载荷特性。

方法

将十对人冈上肌腱一分为二,每具尸体得到四条肌腱。评估大结节处的骨矿物质含量。四种缝线构型(双简单、大块肩袖、关节镜下梅森-艾伦式和双排固定)随机分配并在每组肌腱上进行测试。标本在0.25Hz频率下于5至100N之间循环加载五十个周期,然后在位移控制下以1mm/秒的速度加载至失效。使用三维跟踪系统测量调节伸长、峰峰值伸长、极限拉伸载荷和刚度并进行比较,记录失效类型(缝线或锚钉拔出)。

结果

缝线在调节伸长方面未发现显著差异。大块肩袖(1.1±0.1mm)和双排缝线(1.1±0.1mm)的平均峰峰值伸长(及平均标准误差)显著低于关节镜下梅森-艾伦式缝线(1.5±0.2mm)(p<0.05)。双排固定的极限拉伸载荷(287±24N)显著高于所有单排固定(p<0.05)。此外,发现大块肩袖缝线(250±21N)的极限拉伸载荷显著高于双简单(191±18N)和关节镜下梅森-艾伦式(212±21N)缝线(p<0.05)。缝线在刚度方面未发现显著差异。所有缝线的失效机制相似。大结节前半部分的肩袖修复的峰峰值伸长显著低于后半部分,极限拉伸强度则更高。

结论

在这项体外尸体研究中,双排固定的极限拉伸载荷显著高于三种单排固定缝线。在单排固定中,大块肩袖缝线具有与双排固定相似的循环和失效载荷特性。冈上肌腱的前部修复比后部修复具有显著更强的生物力学性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验