Shih L-Y, Liang D-C, Huang C-F, Wu J-H, Lin T-L, Wang P-N, Dunn P, Kuo M-C, Tang T-C
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Leukemia. 2006 Apr;20(4):604-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404124.
The roles of CEBPalpha mutations and its cooperating mutations in the relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are not clear. CEBPalpha mutations were analyzed on 149 patients with de novo AML at both diagnosis and relapse. Twenty-two patients (14.8%) had the mutations at diagnosis, two patients had N-terminal nonsense mutations alone, one had homozygous inframe duplication at the bZIP domain, and 19 patients had both N-terminal and bZIP mutations. Twenty patients relapsed with identical mutant patterns, two lost CEBPalpha mutations and none acquired the mutations at relapse. Cloning analysis showed that the N-terminal and C-terminal mutations occurred on separate cloned alleles and also on the same alleles in most of the diagnosis and relapse samples. Losing one of the two or more mutations on the same allele or acquiring the other mutation on the allele original carrying single mutation were observed not infrequently in the paired samples analyzed. Seven patients with CEBPalpha mutations had cooperating mutations with FLT3/ITD, FLT3/TKD or N-ras but not K-ras mutations. Our study showed that 91% of de novo AML harboring CEBPalpha mutations at diagnosis retained the identical mutant patterns but frequently changed in the allelic distribution at relapse.
CEBPα 突变及其协同突变在急性髓系白血病(AML)复发中的作用尚不清楚。对149例初发AML患者在诊断和复发时均进行了CEBPα 突变分析。22例患者(14.8%)在诊断时有突变,2例患者仅有N端无义突变,1例在bZIP结构域有纯合框内重复,19例患者同时有N端和bZIP突变。20例患者复发时具有相同的突变模式,2例丢失了CEBPα 突变,复发时无患者获得该突变。克隆分析表明,在大多数诊断和复发样本中,N端和C端突变分别发生在不同的克隆等位基因上,也发生在相同的等位基因上。在分析的配对样本中,经常观察到在相同等位基因上丢失两个或更多突变中的一个,或在最初携带单一突变的等位基因上获得另一个突变。7例有CEBPα 突变的患者与FLT3/ITD、FLT3/TKD或N-ras有协同突变,但与K-ras无突变。我们的研究表明,91%在诊断时携带CEBPα 突变的初发AML患者在复发时保留相同的突变模式,但等位基因分布经常发生变化。