Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute, London.
MRC Human Genetics Unit and Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Haematologica. 2018 Jan;103(1):91-100. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.173096. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
Although double-mutated () acute myeloid leukemia is considered to be a favorable-risk disease, relapse remains a major cause of treatment failure. Most patients have a classic biallelic mutant combination with an N-terminal mutation leading to production of p30 protein plus a C-terminal loss-of-function in-frame indel mutation (), but approximately one-third of cases have one or more non-classic mutations, with diverse combinations reported, and there is little information on the consequences of such mutants. We evaluated outcome in a cohort of 104 patients, 79 and 25 with non-classic mutants, and found that the latter may have poorer survival (5-year overall survival 64% 46%; =0.05), particularly post relapse (41% 0%; =0.02). However, for this analysis, all non-classic cases were grouped together, irrespective of mutant combination. As cases have been reported to be hypermethylated, we used methylation profiling to assess whether this could segregate the different mutants. We developed a methylation signature from a preliminary cohort of 10 (including 8 ) and 30 wild-type () samples, and independently validated the signature in 17 cases. Assessment of the signature in 16 cases with different non-classic mutant combinations showed that only 31% had a methylation profile equivalent to whereas for 69% the profile was either intermediate between and or equivalent to These results suggest that cases with non-classic mutants may be functionally different from those with mutants, and should not automatically be included in the same prognostic group. (AML12 is registered under ISRCTN17833622 and AML15 under ISRCTN17161961).
尽管双突变()急性髓系白血病被认为是一种低危疾病,但复发仍然是治疗失败的主要原因。大多数患者具有经典的双等位基因突变组合,其中 N 端突变导致产生 p30 蛋白,C 端无功能框内缺失突变(),但约三分之一的病例具有一种或多种非经典突变,报道了多种组合,并且关于此类突变体的后果知之甚少。我们评估了 104 例患者的队列的结果,其中 79 例和 25 例具有非经典突变体,发现后者的生存率可能较差(5 年总生存率 64%对 46%;=0.05),尤其是在复发后(41%对 0%;=0.02)。然而,对于该分析,所有非经典病例都被不分突变组合地归为一组。由于已报道病例存在高甲基化,我们使用甲基化谱分析来评估这是否可以分离不同的突变体。我们从包括 8 例()在内的 10 例初步队列和 30 例野生型()样本中开发了一个甲基化特征,并在 17 例独立验证样本中验证了该特征。对 16 例具有不同非经典突变组合的样本的特征评估表明,只有 31%的样本具有与相当的甲基化谱,而对于 69%的样本,其谱介于与之间或与相当。这些结果表明,具有非经典突变体的病例在功能上可能与具有突变体的病例不同,并且不应自动归入同一预后组。(AML12 在 ISRCTN12525547 和 AML15 在 ISRCTN17161961 下注册)。