宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划中现场验证的意义。 - Suppr | 超能文献

文献检索
文档翻译
深度研究
学术资讯

Zotero 插件

邀请有礼
套餐&价格
历史记录

应用&插件

Zotero 插件浏览器插件 Mac 客户端 Windows 客户端微信小程序

定价

高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包

服务

文献检索文档翻译深度研究 API 文档 MCP 服务

关于我们

关于 Suppr 公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款

关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究

粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划中现场验证的意义。 - Suppr | 超能文献

Significance of field validation in the interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.

作者信息

Oxley Dwight K

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Feb;130(2):144; author reply 144-5. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-144a-SOFVIT.

DOI:10.5858/2006-130-144a-SOFVIT

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

1

Significance of field validation in the interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划中现场验证的意义。

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Feb;130(2):144; author reply 144-5. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-144a-SOFVIT.

2

Measuring the significance of field validation in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology: how good are the experts?

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 May;129(5):609-13. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-0609-MTSOFV.

3

How expert are the experts? Implications for proficiency testing in cervicovaginal cytology.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 May;129(5):604-5. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-0604-HEATEI.

4

Measuring the significance of participant evaluation of acceptability of cases in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology.衡量美国病理学家学会宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划中参与者对病例可接受性评估的重要性。

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Sep;129(9):1093-6. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1093-MTSOPE.

5

The potential for failure in gynecologic regulatory proficiency testing with current slide validation criteria: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison in Gynecologic Cytology Program.当前玻片验证标准下妇科监管能力验证测试失败的可能性：美国病理学家学会妇科细胞学项目实验室间比对结果

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Aug;130(8):1114-8. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1114-TPFFIG.

6

Testing in cervicovaginal cytology.宫颈阴道细胞学检查

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Jan;130(1):13. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-13a-TICC.

7

Robustness of validation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.美国病理学家学会宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划中验证标准的稳健性

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Aug;130(8):1119-22. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1119-ROVCIT.

8

Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology.传统涂片鳞状细胞癌的细胞学特征：在美国病理学家学会宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比对计划中表现不佳与表现良好的病例比较

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Sep;129(9):1097-9. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1097-CFOSCC.

9

Cytologic features of adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified, in conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology.常规涂片检查中未另行指定的腺癌的细胞学特征：在美国病理学家学会宫颈阴道细胞学实验室间比较计划中表现较差的病例与表现良好的病例的比较。

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Jan;130(1):23-6. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-23-CFOANO.

10

Cytopathology laboratory improvement programs of the College of American Pathologists: Laboratory Accreditation Program (CAP LAP) and Performance Improvement Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (CAP PAP).美国病理学家学会的细胞病理学实验室改进项目：实验室认可计划（CAP LAP）和宫颈阴道细胞学性能改进计划（CAP PAP）。

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Mar;121(3):256-9.