• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便潜血检测真的能降低死亡率吗?对系统评价数据的重新分析。

Does fecal occult blood testing really reduce mortality? A reanalysis of systematic review data.

作者信息

Moayyedi Paul, Achkar Edgar

机构信息

Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):380-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00537.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00537.x
PMID:16454847
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer mortality. A variety of CRC screening strategies are being adopted in many developed countries. Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is one option for screening that has the most evidence for efficacy and is also the cheapest approach. Systematic reviews suggest that FOBT is effective in reducing CRC mortality but the data on overall mortality from any cause has rarely been synthesized.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials identified by a Cochrane review of the efficacy of FOBT were reanalyzed. Trials that reported on biennial FOBT with all cause mortality assessed at similar follow-up periods were analyzed. CRC, non-CRC, and all cause mortality were evaluated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Three trials were analyzed, involving 245,217 subjects with 2,148 CRC deaths after almost 3 million patient-years follow-up. The relative risk (RR) of CRC death in the FOBT arm was 0.87 (95% CI = 0.8-0.95). The RR of non-CRC death in the FOBT group was 1.02 (95% CI = 1.00-1.04, p = 0.015). The increase in non-CRC in the FOBT group balanced the decrease in CRC mortality with no overall impact on mortality (RR of dying in the FOBT arm = 1.002, 95% CI = 0.989-1.015).

CONCLUSION

The impact of FOBT in reducing mortality from any cause is uncertain and efficacy of this strategy for CRC screening needs reevaluation.

摘要

引言

结直肠癌(CRC)是癌症死亡的常见原因。许多发达国家正在采用多种结直肠癌筛查策略。粪便潜血试验(FOBT)是一种筛查选择,有最多的疗效证据,也是最便宜的方法。系统评价表明,FOBT可有效降低结直肠癌死亡率,但关于任何原因导致的总体死亡率的数据很少被综合分析。

方法

对Cochrane关于FOBT疗效的综述中确定的随机对照试验进行重新分析。分析那些报告了每两年进行一次FOBT且在相似随访期评估全因死亡率的试验。使用随机效应模型评估结直肠癌、非结直肠癌和全因死亡率。

结果

分析了三项试验,涉及245,217名受试者,经过近300万患者年的随访后有2,148例结直肠癌死亡。FOBT组结直肠癌死亡的相对风险(RR)为0.87(95%置信区间 = 0.8 - 0.95)。FOBT组非结直肠癌死亡的RR为1.02(95%置信区间 = 1.00 - 1.04,p = 0.015)。FOBT组非结直肠癌死亡的增加抵消了结直肠癌死亡率的降低,对总体死亡率没有总体影响(FOBT组死亡的RR = 1.002,95%置信区间 = 0.989 - 1.015)。

结论

FOBT对降低任何原因导致的死亡率的影响尚不确定,这种结直肠癌筛查策略的疗效需要重新评估。

相似文献

1
Does fecal occult blood testing really reduce mortality? A reanalysis of systematic review data.粪便潜血检测真的能降低死亡率吗?对系统评价数据的重新分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):380-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00537.x.
2
Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test.粪便潜血试验用于结直肠癌筛查的对照试验的深入综述与荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Apr;18(4):427-33. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200604000-00018.
3
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.使用便潜血试验(Hemoccult)筛查结直肠癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2.
4
[Population screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review].[结直肠癌的人群筛查:一项系统评价]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Oct;27(8):450-9. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5705(03)70502-0.
5
SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19.用于治疗 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 中和单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2.
6
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Systematic review on urine albumin testing for early detection of diabetic complications.关于尿白蛋白检测用于早期发现糖尿病并发症的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Aug;9(30):iii-vi, xiii-163. doi: 10.3310/hta9300.
9
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.接种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗以预防宫颈癌及其癌前病变。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3.
10
Systematic review of the effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌人群筛查有效性的系统评价
N Z Med J. 2007 Jul 20;120(1258):U2629.

引用本文的文献

1
Can circulating microRNAs predict colorectal cancer? Results from a nested case-control study of pre-diagnostic serum samples from two prospective biobanks.循环微RNA能否预测结直肠癌?两项前瞻性生物样本库中诊断前血清样本的巢式病例对照研究结果。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13854-1.
2
Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait.科威特三种结直肠癌筛查方式的成本效益分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91119-4.
3
Colonoscopic Screening and Risk of All-Cause and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in Young and Older Individuals.
结肠镜筛查与年轻和老年个体全因和结直肠癌死亡率的关系。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Apr;55(2):618-625. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.852. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
4
Fecal Occult Blood Test Results of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in South Korea (2006-2013).韩国国家结直肠癌筛查计划(2006-2013 年)粪便潜血试验结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 5;7(1):2804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03134-9.
5
Highly sensitive, non-invasive detection of colorectal cancer mutations using single molecule, third generation sequencing.使用单分子第三代测序技术对结直肠癌突变进行高灵敏度、非侵入性检测。
Appl Transl Genom. 2015 Oct 16;7:32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2015.08.006. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
An evaluation of healthcare information on the Internet: the case of colorectal cancer prevention.互联网上医疗保健信息的评估:以结直肠癌预防为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jan 14;11(1):1058-75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110101058.
7
Number needed to sacrifice: statistical taboo or decision-making tool?需牺牲的数量:统计禁忌还是决策工具?
JRSM Short Rep. 2013 Mar;4(3):22. doi: 10.1177/2042533313476684. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Too much of a good thing: cancer screening in the old and infirm.过犹不及:老年及体弱人群的癌症筛查
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):6-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2233-z.
9
The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.《NordICC 研究》:结肠镜筛查结直肠癌的一项随机试验的原理和设计。
Endoscopy. 2012 Jul;44(7):695-702. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306895. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
10
A randomized questionnaire-based study on the impact of providing numerical information on colorectal cancer screening.一项基于问卷调查的关于提供结直肠癌筛查数值信息影响的随机研究。
JRSM Short Rep. 2011 Jun;2(6):48. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011030. Epub 2011 Jun 13.