Suppr超能文献

[急性坏死性胰腺炎:38例患者的治疗结果]

[Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: the results of the management of 38 patients].

作者信息

Tireli Mustafa, Yildirim Atilla, Güçlü Cem, Calik Bülent, Diliüz Burcu

机构信息

Department of General Surgery Medicine Faculty of Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2006 Jan;12(1):26-34.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the patients who underwent surgical or nonoperative treatment for acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

METHODS

The study included 38 patients (22 males, 16 females; mean age 51.3 years; range 16 to 79 years) with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Surgical treatment was performed in 23 patients, while 15 patients were treated conservatively.

RESULTS

Gallstone (in 17 patients) was the most common cause of pancreatitis. Twenty-five patients had sterile necrotizing pancreatitis, while 13 patients had infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Fifteen of the 25 cases with sterile necrosis were treated conservatively. The other 10 patients were initially treated by conservative methods, and were later treated surgically (due to six incorrect diagnosis, three organ failures, and one symptomatic pseudocyst). We applied continuous lavage to six of those patients and conventional drainage to four of them. Mortality rate was 23.7% globally; 24.0% in the sterile necrosis group and 23.1% in the infected necrosis group. Mortality rate was 21.7% in the surgical treatment group, and 26.7% in the conservative treatment group. There were no statistically significant differences between those groups (p>0.05). Eleven of the 29 patients who survived had some complications.

CONCLUSION

The management of sterile pancreatic necrosis is still a matter of debate. Most patients with sterile necrosis can be treated with conservative methods. Indication for surgery in sterile necrosis should be based on persisting or advancing organ complications and sepsis signs despite intensive care therapy. The patients with infected necrosis should be treated surgically. Surgical intervention is best deferred until the demarcation of necrosis is complete.

摘要

背景

我们对接受急性坏死性胰腺炎手术或非手术治疗的患者进行了评估。

方法

该研究纳入了38例急性坏死性胰腺炎患者(22例男性,16例女性;平均年龄51.3岁;年龄范围16至79岁)。23例患者接受了手术治疗,15例患者接受了保守治疗。

结果

胆结石(17例患者)是胰腺炎最常见的病因。25例患者为无菌性坏死性胰腺炎,13例患者为感染性坏死性胰腺炎。25例无菌性坏死患者中有15例接受了保守治疗。另外10例患者最初采用保守治疗,后来接受了手术治疗(原因是6例诊断错误、3例器官功能衰竭和1例有症状的假性囊肿)。我们对其中6例患者进行了持续灌洗,对4例患者进行了传统引流。总体死亡率为23.7%;无菌性坏死组为24.0%,感染性坏死组为23.1%。手术治疗组死亡率为21.7%,保守治疗组为26.7%。这些组之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。29例存活患者中有11例出现了一些并发症。

结论

无菌性胰腺坏死的治疗仍存在争议。大多数无菌性坏死患者可以采用保守方法治疗。无菌性坏死的手术指征应基于尽管进行了重症监护治疗但仍持续或进展的器官并发症和脓毒症体征。感染性坏死患者应接受手术治疗。手术干预最好推迟到坏死界限完全清楚之后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验