Ornelas Lorraine, Padilla Luis, Di Silvio Mauricio, Schalch Paul, Esperante Sandro, Infante Paul López, Bustamante Juan Carlos, Avalos Pablo, Varela Deborah, López Manuel
School of Medicine, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006 Feb;22(2):119-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932506.
The search for better surgical repair of nerve injuries should be aimed at uncovering alternatives that not only are efficient, but also enhance nerve growth. The purpose of this study was to compare functional nerve responses following repair with either a traditional microsuture technique or Quixil human fibrin sealant. Thirty female Lewis rats received transection of the right sciatic nerve. Nerve repair was achieved with either epineurial microsuture (n = 15) or Quixil fibrin glue (n = 15). Functional results were assessed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively with walking-track analysis. Electrophysiologic nerve recordings were also performed 12 weeks postoperatively. Rats receiving Quixil nerve repair returned to baseline performance on the walking-track analysis significantly faster than those with microsuture repairs (6 and 12 weeks postoperatively; p < 0.0001). Recovery of nerve conduction velocities and wave amplitudes was also significantly better in the nerves repaired with Quixil than in those repaired with microsuture (p's < 0.0001). Quixil human fibrin sealant is a good alternative to traditional microsuture nerve repair techniques.
寻找更好的神经损伤手术修复方法应致力于发现不仅有效而且能促进神经生长的替代方法。本研究的目的是比较采用传统显微缝合技术或Quixil人纤维蛋白密封剂进行修复后的功能性神经反应。30只雌性Lewis大鼠接受右侧坐骨神经横断术。分别采用神经外膜显微缝合(n = 15)或Quixil纤维蛋白胶(n = 15)进行神经修复。术后2周、6周和12周通过行走轨迹分析评估功能结果。术后12周还进行了电生理神经记录。接受Quixil神经修复的大鼠在行走轨迹分析中恢复到基线表现的速度明显快于接受显微缝合修复的大鼠(术后6周和12周;p < 0.0001)。Quixil修复的神经在神经传导速度和波幅恢复方面也明显优于显微缝合修复的神经(p值 < 0.0001)。Quixil人纤维蛋白密封剂是传统显微缝合神经修复技术的良好替代方法。