Ornelas Lorraine, Padilla Luis, Di Silvio Mauricio, Schalch Paul, Esperante Sandro, Infante Raul López, Bustamante Juan Carlos, Avalos Pablo, Varela Deborah, López Manuel
School of Medicine, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006 Feb;22(2):123-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932507.
The results of nerve repair with fibrin glue and microsuture were evaluated in rat nerve transection models. Ninety Wistar-Furth rat median nerves were exposed, transected, and repaired in an end-to-end fashion with one of four substances/techniques: 1) human fibrin sealant (Quixil); 2) autologous graft and human fibrin sealant (Quixil); 3) bovine fibrin sealant (Tissucol); and 4) nylon microsuture, epineurial technique. Histologic analyses were performed at 3-, 6-, and 9-month postoperative intervals, and factors evaluated included: presence of inflammatory cells (i.e., macrophages and T cells); number of Schwann cells at the repair site; number of blood vessels; fibrosis; axonal regeneration; and fiber alignment. An additional group underwent histologic analysis at 3 weeks following repair with Quixil. Surgical time of repair was also measured. Nerve repairs performed with fibrin sealants produced less inflammatory response and fibrosis, and better axonal regeneration and fiber alignment than nerve repairs performed with microsuture. In addition, the fibrin sealant techniques were quicker and easier to use. The authors conclude that fibrin sealant represents a good alternative technique to microsuture for peripheral-nerve repair.
在大鼠神经横断模型中评估了使用纤维蛋白胶和显微缝合进行神经修复的结果。暴露90只Wistar-Furth大鼠的正中神经,将其横断,然后用以下四种物质/技术之一进行端端修复:1)人纤维蛋白封闭剂(Quixil);2)自体移植物和人纤维蛋白封闭剂(Quixil);3)牛纤维蛋白封闭剂(Tissucol);4)尼龙显微缝合,采用神经外膜技术。在术后3个月、6个月和9个月进行组织学分析,评估的因素包括:炎性细胞(即巨噬细胞和T细胞)的存在;修复部位施万细胞的数量;血管数量;纤维化;轴突再生;以及纤维排列。另一组在使用Quixil修复后3周进行组织学分析。还测量了修复的手术时间。与使用显微缝合进行的神经修复相比,使用纤维蛋白封闭剂进行的神经修复产生的炎症反应和纤维化更少,轴突再生和纤维排列更好。此外,纤维蛋白封闭剂技术使用起来更快且更容易。作者得出结论,对于周围神经修复,纤维蛋白封闭剂是显微缝合的一种良好替代技术。