Suppr超能文献

评估两种三维虚拟计算机重建技术,用于比较唇腭裂与正常胎儿微观解剖结构。

Evaluation of two 3D virtual computer reconstructions for comparison of cleft lip and palate to normal fetal microanatomy.

作者信息

Landes Constantin A, Weichert Frank, Geis Philipp, Helga Fritsch, Wagner Mathias

机构信息

Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, J.-W. Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Mar;288(3):248-62. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.20289.

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate reconstructive surgery requires thorough knowledge of normal and pathological labial, palatal, and velopharyngeal anatomy. This study compared two software algorithms and their 3D virtual anatomical reconstruction because exact 3D micromorphological reconstruction may improve learning, reveal spatial relationships, and provide data for mathematical modeling. Transverse and frontal serial sections of the midface of 18 fetal specimens (11th to 32nd gestational week) were used for two manual segmentation approaches. The first manual segmentation approach used bitmap images and either Windows-based or Mac-based SURFdriver commercial software that allowed manual contour matching, surface generation with average slice thickness, 3D triangulation, and real-time interactive virtual 3D reconstruction viewing. The second manual segmentation approach used tagged image format and platform-independent prototypical SeViSe software developed by one of the authors (F.W.). Distended or compressed structures were dynamically transformed. Registration was automatic but allowed manual correction, such as individual section thickness, surface generation, and interactive virtual 3D real-time viewing. SURFdriver permitted intuitive segmentation, easy manual offset correction, and the reconstruction showed complex spatial relationships in real time. However, frequent software crashes and erroneous landmarks appearing "out of the blue," requiring manual correction, were tedious. Individual section thickness, defined smoothing, and unlimited structure number could not be integrated. The reconstruction remained underdimensioned and not sufficiently accurate for this study's reconstruction problem. SeViSe permitted unlimited structure number, late addition of extra sections, and quantified smoothing and individual slice thickness; however, SeViSe required more elaborate work-up compared to SURFdriver, yet detailed and exact 3D reconstructions were created.

摘要

唇腭裂修复手术需要全面了解正常和病理状态下的唇部、腭部及腭咽解剖结构。本研究比较了两种软件算法及其三维虚拟解剖重建,因为精确的三维微观形态重建可能会改善学习效果、揭示空间关系并为数学建模提供数据。对18个胎儿标本(妊娠第11至32周)的中面部横断和额状连续切片采用了两种手动分割方法。第一种手动分割方法使用位图图像以及基于Windows或Mac的SURFdriver商业软件,该软件允许手动轮廓匹配、以平均切片厚度生成表面、三维三角测量以及实时交互式虚拟三维重建查看。第二种手动分割方法使用标签图像格式和由作者之一(F.W.)开发的与平台无关的原型SeViSe软件。对扩张或压缩的结构进行动态变换。配准是自动的,但允许手动校正,如个别切片厚度、表面生成和交互式虚拟三维实时查看。SURFdriver允许直观分割、易于手动偏移校正,并且重建实时显示复杂的空间关系。然而,频繁的软件崩溃以及错误地标“突然”出现需要手动校正,这很繁琐。无法整合个别切片厚度、定义的平滑处理和无限数量的结构。对于本研究的重建问题,重建的维度不足且不够准确。SeViSe允许无限数量的结构、后期添加额外切片以及量化的平滑处理和个别切片厚度;然而,与SURFdriver相比,SeViSe需要更精细的处理,但创建了详细且精确的三维重建。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验