Bolognese Leonardo, Falsini Giovanni, Liistro Francesco, Angioli Paolo, Ducci Kenneth, Taddei Tamara, Tarducci Roberto, Cosmi Franco, Baldassarre Silvia, Burali Antonio
Azienda Ospedaliera Arezzo, Arezzo, Italy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):522-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.012. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
We aimed to compare the effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban and abciximab on tissue level perfusion and troponin I release in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Optimal timing and dosage of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for ACS remain to be explored.
We randomized 93 high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI to receive upstream (in the coronary care unit) tirofiban, downstream (just prior to PCI) HDB tirofiban, and downstream abciximab. We evaluated the effects of the three drug regimens on tissue-level perfusion using the corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count, the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) before and immediately after PCI and after cardiac troponin I (cTnI).
The TMPG 0/1 perfusion was significantly less frequent with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban and abciximab both before (28.1% vs. 66.7% vs. 71%, respectively; p = 0.0009) and after PCI (6.2% vs. 20% vs. 35.5%, respectively; p = 0.015). Upstream tirofiban was also associated with a significantly higher MCE score index (0.88 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.77 +/- 0.32 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05). Post-procedural cTnI elevation was significantly less frequent among patients in the upstream tirofiban group compared with the HDB tirofiban and abciximab groups (9.4% vs. 30% vs. 38.7%, respectively; p = 0.018). The cTnI levels after PCI were significantly lower with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban (3.8 +/- 4.1 vs. 7.2 +/- 12; p = 0.015) and abciximab (3.8 +/- 4.1 vs. 9 +/- 13.8; p = 0.0002)
Among high-risk non-ST-segment-elevation ACS patients treated with an early invasive strategy, upstream tirofiban is associated with improved tissue-level perfusion and attenuated myocardial damage.
我们旨在比较上游替罗非班与下游大剂量推注(HDB)替罗非班及阿昔单抗,对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的高危非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者组织水平灌注及肌钙蛋白I释放的影响。
用于ACS的糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的最佳时机和剂量仍有待探索。
我们将93例接受PCI的高危ACS患者随机分为三组,分别接受上游(在冠心病监护病房)替罗非班、下游(PCI前即刻)HDB替罗非班和下游阿昔单抗治疗。我们在PCI前后及肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)检测前后,使用校正的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)帧数、TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMPG)及冠状动脉内心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)评估三种药物方案对组织水平灌注的影响。
与HDB替罗非班和阿昔单抗相比,上游替罗非班治疗前(分别为28.1%对66.7%对71%;p = 0.0009)及PCI后(分别为6.2%对20%对35.5%;p = 0.015),TMPG 0/1灌注的发生率显著更低。上游替罗非班还与显著更高的MCE评分指数相关(分别为0.88±0.18对0.77±0.32对0.71±0.30;p < 0.05)。与HDB替罗非班组和阿昔单抗组相比,上游替罗非班组患者术后cTnI升高的发生率显著更低(分别为9.4%对30%对38.7%;p = 0.018)。与HDB替罗非班(3.8±4.1对7.2±12;p = 0.015)和阿昔单抗(3.8±4.1对9±13.8;p = 0.0002)相比,上游替罗非班治疗后PCI时的cTnI水平显著更低。
在采用早期侵入性策略治疗的高危非ST段抬高型ACS患者中,上游替罗非班与改善组织水平灌注及减轻心肌损伤相关。