• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替罗非班与阿昔单抗在直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术促进ST段完全消退中的随机对照比较:替罗非班或阿昔单抗易化血管成形术(FATA)治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死试验的结果

Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial.

作者信息

Marzocchi Antonio, Manari Antonio, Piovaccari Giancarlo, Marrozzini Cinzia, Marra Sebastiano, Magnavacchi Paolo, Sangiorgio Pietro, Marinucci Lucia, Taglieri Nevio, Gordini Giovanni, Binetti Nicola, Guiducci Vincenzo, Franco Nicoletta, Reggiani Maria Letizia-Bacchi, Saia Francesco

机构信息

Istituto di Cardiologia, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti, 9, Bologna 40138, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2972-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn467. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn467
PMID:18940887
Abstract

AIMS

To test the equivalence of high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban vs. abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in terms of ST-segment resolution (STR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The FATA trial (Facilitated Angioplasty with Tirofiban or Abciximab) was a prospective, multicentre, open-label trial that enrolled 692 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive abciximab (n = 341) or HDB tirofiban (n = 351). Primary endpoint was the rate of complete (> or =70%) STR 90 min after first balloon inflation. Thirty-day incidence of major bleedings, death, re-infarction and new revascularizations was also evaluated. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well-balanced, with the exception of previous MI rates (tirofiban 6% vs. abciximab 2.6%, P = 0.03). The procedure was successful in 96.7% of the abciximab and in 96.6% of the tirofiban cohort (P = 0.94). Complete STR was obtained in 67.05% of the tirofiban and 70.45% of the abciximab group (Delta -3.4%, 95% confidence interval -10.35 to +3.56), which falls beyond the predefined Delta +/- 10% equivalence boundaries. Rates of secondary endpoints were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to show the equivalence of HBD of tirofiban and abciximab as adjunctive therapy to PPCI.

摘要

目的

在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)期间,就ST段回落(STR)情况测试大剂量推注(HDB)替罗非班与阿昔单抗的等效性。

方法与结果

FATA试验(替罗非班或阿昔单抗辅助血管成形术)是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签试验,纳入了692例接受PPCI的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受阿昔单抗(n = 341)或HDB替罗非班(n = 351)。主要终点是首次球囊扩张后90分钟时完全(≥70%)STR的发生率。还评估了30天内大出血、死亡、再梗死和新的血管重建的发生率。两组的基线特征均衡良好,但既往心肌梗死发生率除外(替罗非班组为6%,阿昔单抗组为2.6%,P = 0.03)。阿昔单抗组96.7%的患者手术成功,替罗非班组96.6%的患者手术成功(P = 0.94)。替罗非班组67.05%的患者和阿昔单抗组70.45%的患者实现了完全STR(差异为-3.4%,95%置信区间为-10.35至+3.56),超出了预先定义的差异±10%的等效界限。两组的次要终点发生率相似。

结论

本研究未能显示替罗非班的HBD与阿昔单抗作为PPCI辅助治疗的等效性。

相似文献

1
Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial.替罗非班与阿昔单抗在直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术促进ST段完全消退中的随机对照比较:替罗非班或阿昔单抗易化血管成形术(FATA)治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死试验的结果
Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2972-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn467. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
2
Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial.替罗非班或阿昔单抗输注联合血管成形术与西罗莫司洗脱支架或未涂层支架植入术治疗急性心肌梗死的比较:MULTISTRATEGY随机试验
JAMA. 2008 Apr 16;299(15):1788-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.joc80026. Epub 2008 Mar 30.
3
Left ventricular function after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and abciximab or tirofiban (from the Facilitated Angioplasty with Tirofiban or Abciximab [FATA] Trial).接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及使用阿昔单抗或替罗非班治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的左心室功能(源自替罗非班或阿昔单抗辅助血管成形术[FATA]试验)
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 15;103(6):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.029. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
4
Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.应用 SYNTAX 评分预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年临床结局:STRATEGY(单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死)和 MULTISTRATEGY(多中心评价单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗联合西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死研究)试验的一项亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.017.
5
Randomized comparison of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high bolus dose tirofiban or abciximab on tissue-level perfusion and troponin release in high-risk acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: the EVEREST trial.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,上游替罗非班与下游高剂量推注替罗非班或阿昔单抗对组织水平灌注和肌钙蛋白释放影响的随机对照研究:珠穆朗玛峰试验
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):522-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.012. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
6
Persistent coronary no flow after wire insertion is an early and readily available mortality risk factor despite successful mechanical intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis from the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.尽管在急性心肌梗死中成功进行了机械干预,但导丝插入后持续无复流是一个早期且易于获得的死亡风险因素:来自 STRATEGY(单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死)和 MULTISTRATEGY(多中心评估单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗与西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死的研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.016.
7
Intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration: the comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during emergency reperfusion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合血栓抽吸术治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中冠状动脉内与静脉内应用阿昔单抗的比较:ST 段抬高型心肌梗死紧急再灌注时冠状动脉内与静脉内应用阿昔单抗的比较(CICERO)试验。
Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):2709-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.002741. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
8
Three-year follow-up of the MULTIcentre evaluation of Single high-dose Bolus TiRofiban versus Abciximab with Sirolimus-eluting STEnt or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction StudY (MULTISTRATEGY).多中心评估单高剂量替罗非班与西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死研究(MULTISTRATEGY)的 3 年随访结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Apr 30;165(1):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.07.106. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
9
Two-by-two factorial comparison of high-bolus-dose tirofiban followed by standard infusion versus abciximab and sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: design and rationale for the MULTI-STRATEGY trial.高剂量推注替罗非班后标准输注与阿昔单抗以及急性心肌梗死患者中雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入的二乘二析因比较:MULTI-STRATEGY试验的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2007 Jul;154(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.023.
10
Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial.随机比较依替巴肽与阿昔单抗在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:EVA-AMI 试验结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 3;56(6):463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.093.

引用本文的文献

1
Current and Future Roles of Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Angioplasty for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.糖蛋白IIb-IIIa抑制剂在ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接血管成形术中的当前及未来作用
Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 4;12(9):2023. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12092023.
2
Evaluate Short-Term Outcomes of abciximab in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.评价替罗非班在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的短期预后:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 May 29;2022:3911414. doi: 10.1155/2022/3911414. eCollection 2022.
3
Equivalence trials.
等效性试验。
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):114-117. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_55_22. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Platelet GP IIb-IIIa Receptor Antagonists in Primary Angioplasty: Back to the Future.血小板 GP IIb-IIIa 受体拮抗剂在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:回到未来。
Drugs. 2015 Jul;75(11):1229-53. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0425-7.
5
Integrin αIIbβ3: from discovery to efficacious therapeutic target.整合素 αIIbβ3:从发现到有效的治疗靶点。
Circ Res. 2013 Apr 12;112(8):1189-200. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300570.
6
Would tirofiban have been shown non-inferior to abciximab had the TENACITY trial not been terminated for financial reasons?如果 TENACITY 试验不是因为财务原因而终止,替罗非班是否会被证明不比阿昔单抗差?
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12020.x. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
7
Boosting platelet inhibition in poor responder to aspirin and clopidogrel undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: role of tirofiban.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的阿司匹林和氯吡格雷低反应者中增强血小板抑制作用:替罗非班的作用
J Blood Med. 2010;1:61-9. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S7236. Epub 2010 May 10.
8
Intracoronary versus intravenous high-dose bolus plus maintenance administration of tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时冠状动脉内与静脉内给予高剂量替罗非班推注加维持治疗的比较。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012 Jul;34(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0685-y.
9
Tirofiban versus abciximab: tirofiban is administered at suboptimal dosages when evaluated in an arterial thrombosis model in non-human primates.替罗非班与阿昔单抗比较:替罗非班在非人类灵长类动物的动脉血栓模型中评价时给药剂量不理想。
Clin Exp Med. 2012 Dec;12(4):257-63. doi: 10.1007/s10238-011-0171-4. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
10
Safety and efficacy of abciximab as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention.阿昔单抗作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗辅助药物的安全性和有效性。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Mar 3;6:39-45. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s4168.