• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

存在等待时间和等候名单情况下的择期手术供应动态模型。

A dynamic model of supply of elective surgery in the presence of waiting times and waiting lists.

作者信息

Siciliani Luigi

机构信息

Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;25(5):891-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.12.002
PMID:16458374
Abstract

This paper analyses hospitals' decisions regarding the supply of elective surgery in a dynamic model in the presence of waiting times and waiting lists. We show that periods of increasing (decreasing) supply and increasing (decreasing) waiting list may be optimal paths towards the steady state. We also analyse the hospitals' response to exogenous shocks on the demand and the supply. For example, an increase in the marginal tariff for the provider generates overshooting in the supply: supply jumps upwards when the shock is introduced and then slowly reduces towards the steady-state value.

摘要

本文在存在等待时间和等候名单的动态模型中分析了医院关于选择性手术供应的决策。我们表明,供应增加(减少)且等候名单增加(减少)的时期可能是通向稳态的最优路径。我们还分析了医院对需求和供应方面外部冲击的反应。例如,提供者边际收费的增加会导致供应出现超调:当引入冲击时供应向上跃升,然后朝着稳态值缓慢下降。

相似文献

1
A dynamic model of supply of elective surgery in the presence of waiting times and waiting lists.存在等待时间和等候名单情况下的择期手术供应动态模型。
J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;25(5):891-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
2
Waiting lists. The wrong target.等候名单。错误的目标。
Health Serv J. 1998 Apr 2;108(5598):28-31.
3
The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.扩大患者对医疗服务提供者的选择对等待时间的影响:一项政策实验的证据。
Health Econ. 2007 Feb;16(2):113-28. doi: 10.1002/hec.1146.
4
Hospital competition, GP fundholders and waiting times in the UK internal market: the case of elective surgery.英国内部市场中的医院竞争、全科医生基金持有者与候诊时间:择期手术案例
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Mar;3(1):25-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1023219915747.
5
Towards decision support for waiting lists: an operations management view.迈向等待名单的决策支持:运营管理视角
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Jun;4(2):133-42. doi: 10.1023/a:1011409711828.
6
[Waiting lists management model based on timeliness and justice].基于及时性与公平性的候诊名单管理模式
Rev Med Chil. 2016 Jun;144(6):781-7. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000600014.
7
Data briefing. Variation in elective pathways.
Health Serv J. 2007 Mar 8;117(6046):suppl 5.
8
The effect of waiting times on demand and supply for elective surgery: Evidence from Italy.等待时间对择期手术供需的影响:来自意大利的证据。
Health Econ. 2017 Sep;26 Suppl 2:92-105. doi: 10.1002/hec.3545.
9
Data briefing. Elective waiting times tracker.数据简报。择期等待时间追踪器。
Health Serv J. 2005 Jun 30;115(5962):23.
10
Are waiting lists inevitable?等候名单是不可避免的吗?
Health Policy. 1996 Apr;36(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00790-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The shadows of waiting and care: on discourses of waiting in the history of the British National Health Service.等待与关怀的阴影:论英国国民医疗服务体系历史中的等待话语
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Feb 13;8:73. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18913.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Dually-enrolled patients choose providers with lower wait times: Budgetary implications for the VHA.双重注册患者选择等待时间更短的提供者:对 VHA 的预算影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):744-754. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13950. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Waiting time distribution in public health care: empirics and theory.
公共医疗保健中的等待时间分布:实证与理论。
Health Econ Rev. 2015 Dec;5(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0061-7. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Discrimination in waiting times by insurance type and financial soundness of German acute care hospitals.德国急症护理医院的保险类型和财务稳健性导致的等候时间差异。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Oct;12(5):405-16. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0254-2. Epub 2010 May 23.