Suppr超能文献

连续双手和单手运动中的动作间隔与空间同化效应

Intermovement interval and spatial assimilation effects in sequential bimanual and unimanual movements.

作者信息

Sherwood David E

机构信息

Department of Integrative Physiology, Campus Box 354, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, USA.

出版信息

Hum Mov Sci. 2006 Apr;25(2):145-64. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

Abstract

This study extended earlier work by showing spatial assimilations in sequential bimanual and unimanual movements separated by 1.5-3.5 s. In Experiments 1 and 2, 30 right-handed participants (18-22 years of age) made rapid single and bimanual lever reversals of 20 degrees and 60 degrees assigned to 1.5, 2.5, or 3.5 s intermovement interval groups. Participants self-timed the intermovement interval in the first experiment, but it was provided in the second experiment using separate auditory stimuli. In the third experiment, participants performed both the 20 degree and 60 degree movement with the same hand. In all experiments, the shorter-distance limb overshot and the longer-distance limb undershot the targets in both bimanual and unimanual sequential movements relative to single movements in all three intermovement interval groups, particularly in the non-dominant left limb. The results suggest that assimilation effects in sequential movements are caused by command interactions at the planning level, but the effects are reduced by practice.

摘要

本研究通过展示在间隔1.5 - 3.5秒的连续双手和单手动作中的空间同化,扩展了早期的研究工作。在实验1和实验2中,30名右利手参与者(年龄在18 - 22岁之间)进行了快速的单手和双手杠杆反转动作,反转角度分别为20度和60度,并被分配到1.5秒、2.5秒或3.5秒的动作间隔组。在第一个实验中,参与者自行控制动作间隔时间,但在第二个实验中,通过单独的听觉刺激提供动作间隔时间。在第三个实验中,参与者用同一只手进行20度和60度的动作。在所有实验中,在所有三个动作间隔组中,相对于单动作,在双手和单手连续动作中,距离较短的肢体越过了目标,而距离较长的肢体未达到目标,特别是在非优势的左肢。结果表明,连续动作中的同化效应是由计划层面的指令交互引起的,但这种效应会因练习而减弱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验