Fisher Mark B, Santucci Richard A
Department of Urology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Urology. 2006 Feb;67(2):423.e9-423.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.038.
Long-term analyses of the UroLume Endoprosthesis have shown conflicting results with regard to efficacy and restricture rates. The best management of recurrent urethra stricture disease at the site of a previous UroLume stent is unknown. We describe a previously unreported technique for transperineal excision of the UroLume for recurrent bulbar urethral stricture disease with one-stage reconstruction using buccal mucosa. At 9 months of follow-up, the patient was voiding well with no evidence of stricture recurrence.
对UroLume内支架的长期分析显示,在疗效和狭窄发生率方面存在相互矛盾的结果。对于先前放置UroLume支架部位的复发性尿道狭窄疾病,最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。我们描述了一种先前未报道的技术,用于经会阴切除UroLume以治疗复发性球部尿道狭窄疾病,并使用颊黏膜进行一期重建。在随访9个月时,患者排尿良好,无狭窄复发迹象。