Kumar Shrawan, Ferrari Robert, Narayan Yogesh, Jones Troy
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Feb;29(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.008.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a standard 3-point lap-and-shoulder seat belt and car seat on the electromyogram (EMG) response of the cervical muscles to increasing low-velocity impacts in comparison with that of a rigid seat and 5-point restraint.
Seventeen healthy volunteers were subjected to rear, frontal, right and left lateral and bilateral anterolateral, and posterolateral impacts with an acceleration varying from 4.4 to 16.8 m/s(2) while in a car seat with lap-and-shoulder seat belt.
For rear-end impacts, whether straight on, right posterolateral, or left posterolateral, all muscles generated 50% or less of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) EMG. In straight-on rear impacts, the sternocleidomastoid was symmetrically the most active; however, in posterolateral impacts, the sternocleidomastoid contralateral to impact direction was more active than its counterpart. For a right lateral impact, at the highest acceleration, the left splenius capitis generated 47% of its MVC and the left trapezius did 46% of its MVC. In a left lateral impact, the right splenius capitis generated 48% of its MVC and the right trapezius did 57% of its MVC. In a straight-on frontal impact, the left trapezius generated 35% of its MVC and the right trapezius did 48% of its MVC. In a left anterolateral impact, the right splenius generated 60% of its MVC and the right trapezius did 66% of its MVC. Similarly, in a right anterolateral impact, the contralateral splenius muscle increased its activity to 52% of its MVC and the left trapezius was at 52% of its MVC.
Compared with previously reported impact studies with a rigid seat and 5-point harness, the use of a 3-point lap-and-shoulder seat belt with a standard car seat did not appear to adversely affect cervical muscle response. In very-low-velocity and low-velocity impact experiments, seat belt and seat type may not significantly alter cervical EMG and kinematics.
本研究的目的是确定标准三点式腰肩安全带和汽车座椅与刚性座椅和五点式约束装置相比,在低速撞击增加时对颈部肌肉肌电图(EMG)反应的影响。
17名健康志愿者在系有腰肩安全带的汽车座椅中,受到后方、前方、右侧和左侧以及双侧前外侧和后外侧撞击,加速度范围为4.4至16.8米/秒²。
对于追尾撞击,无论是正面、右后外侧还是左后外侧,所有肌肉产生的肌电图均为最大自主收缩(MVC)的50%或更低。在正面追尾撞击中,胸锁乳突肌对称地最为活跃;然而,在外侧撞击中,与撞击方向对侧的胸锁乳突肌比其对应侧更活跃。对于右侧撞击,在最高加速度时,左侧头夹肌产生其MVC的47%,左侧斜方肌产生其MVC的46%。在左侧撞击中,右侧头夹肌产生其MVC的48%,右侧斜方肌产生其MVC的57%。在正面撞击中,左侧斜方肌产生其MVC的35%,右侧斜方肌产生其MVC的48%。在左侧前外侧撞击中,右侧夹肌产生其MVC的60%,右侧斜方肌产生其MVC的66%。同样,在右侧前外侧撞击中,对侧夹肌的活动增加到其MVC的52%,左侧斜方肌为其MVC的52%。
与先前报道的使用刚性座椅和五点式安全带的撞击研究相比,使用标准汽车座椅搭配三点式腰肩安全带似乎不会对颈部肌肉反应产生不利影响。在极低速度和低速撞击实验中,安全带和座椅类型可能不会显著改变颈部肌电图和运动学。