Shiels Christopher, Gabbay Mark
Mersey Primary Care R&D Consortium, Division of Primary Care, Whelan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.
Fam Pract. 2006 Apr;23(2):246-52. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi110. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
Little research has focused upon how GP and patient gender interact to influence the outcome of consultation. In particular, no UK studies have investigated the effect of gender interaction on the duration of patients' certified sickness.
To investigate associations between the four GP-patient gender interaction categories and patient risk of intermediate or long-term work incapacity.
Use of carbonized sickness certificates to collect routine sick note data over a 12-month collection period.
Nine general practices in the Mersey Primary Care R&D Consortium.
A total of 3906 patients, certified sick by 67 GPs (including 45 GP principals).
The effect of gender interaction was measured against two outcomes: intermediate (6-28 week) and long-term (28 weeks or over) periods of certified sickness.
After univariate and multivariate analyses, it was discovered that certification of male patients by male GPs was significantly associated with increased prevalence of intermediate (6-28 week) certified sickness outcomes, compared with females certified by females (OR=1.38 P=0.009). This result was replicated in the subgroup of patients with mild mental disorder-related sickness absence. However, no association was demonstrated between gender interaction and long-term (>or=28 week) outcome, in the total patient group or within diagnostic subcategories.
GP and patient gender appear to have most impact upon sickness certification in the intermediate period. This period is already recognized as the optimum time for interventions to prevent onset of long-term incapacity, particularly in cases where the cause of sickness absence is reversible (as in psychological-related certified sickness absence). Further research is needed (particularly focusing upon attitudes and content of consultations) in order to shed more light on the gender differences found in this study.
很少有研究关注全科医生(GP)与患者的性别交互如何影响诊疗结果。特别是,英国尚无研究调查性别交互对患者疾病证明持续时间的影响。
调查四种全科医生与患者性别交互类别与患者中期或长期工作无能力风险之间的关联。
在12个月的收集期内,使用碳化疾病证明来收集常规病假条数据。
默西初级保健研发联盟的9家全科诊所。
共有3906名患者,由67名全科医生(包括45名全科诊所负责人)开具疾病证明。
根据两个结果衡量性别交互的影响:中期(6 - 28周)和长期(28周及以上)疾病证明期。
经过单变量和多变量分析,发现男性全科医生为男性患者开具证明与中期(6 - 28周)疾病证明结果患病率增加显著相关,相比之下女性全科医生为女性患者开具证明(比值比=1.38,P = 0.009)。这一结果在与轻度精神障碍相关病假的患者亚组中得到重现。然而,在总患者组或诊断子类别中,未发现性别交互与长期(≥28周)结果之间存在关联。
全科医生与患者的性别似乎对中期疾病证明影响最大。这一时期已被认为是预防长期无能力发作的干预最佳时机,特别是在病假原因可逆的情况下(如与心理相关的疾病证明病假)。需要进一步研究(尤其关注诊疗态度和内容),以便更清楚地了解本研究中发现的性别差异。