Vaccaro Alexander R, Lim Moe R, Hurlbert R John, Lehman Ronald A, Harrop James, Fisher D Charles, Dvorak Marcel, Anderson D Greg, Zeiller Steven C, Lee Joon Y, Fehlings Michael G, Oner F C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Feb;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000180080.59559.45.
The optimal surgical approach and treatment of unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries are poorly defined owing to a lack of widely accepted level I clinical literature. This lack of evidence-based standards has led to varied practice patterns based on individual surgeon preferences. The purpose of this study was to survey the leaders in the field of spine trauma to define the major characteristics of thoracolumbar injuries that influence their surgical decision making. In the absence of good scientific data, expert consensus opinions may provide surgeons with a practical framework to guide therapy and to conduct future research.
A panel of 22 leading spinal surgeons from 20 level I trauma centers in seven countries met to discuss the indications for surgical approach selection in unstable thoracolumbar injuries. Injuries were presented to the surgeons in a case scenario survey format. Preferred surgical approaches to the clinical scenarios were tabulated and comments weighed.
All members of the panel agreed that three independent characteristics of thoracolumbar injuries carry primary importance in surgical decision making: the injury morphology, the neurologic status of the patient, and the integrity of the posterior ligaments. Six clinical scenarios based on the neurologic status of the patient (intact, incomplete, or complete) and on the status of the posterior ligamentous complex (intact or disrupted) were created, and consensus treatment approaches were described. Additional circumstances capable of altering the treatments were acknowledged.
Decision making for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar injuries is largely dependent on three patient characteristics: injury morphology, neurologic status, and posterior ligament integrity. A logical and practical decision-making process based on these characteristics may guide treatment even for the most complicated fracture patterns.
由于缺乏广泛认可的一级临床文献,不稳定型胸腰椎脊柱损伤的最佳手术方法和治疗方式尚未明确界定。这种缺乏循证医学标准的情况导致了基于个体外科医生偏好的不同实践模式。本研究的目的是调查脊柱创伤领域的领军人物,以确定影响其手术决策的胸腰椎损伤的主要特征。在缺乏良好科学数据的情况下,专家共识意见可为外科医生提供一个实用的框架,以指导治疗并开展未来研究。
来自七个国家20个一级创伤中心的22位顶尖脊柱外科医生组成的小组开会讨论不稳定型胸腰椎损伤手术入路选择的指征。以病例情景调查的形式向外科医生展示损伤情况。将针对临床情景的首选手术入路制成表格,并权衡各种意见。
小组所有成员一致认为,胸腰椎损伤的三个独立特征在手术决策中最为重要:损伤形态、患者的神经学状态以及后韧带的完整性。根据患者的神经学状态(完整、不完全或完全)和后韧带复合体的状态(完整或断裂)创建了六种临床情景,并描述了共识性的治疗方法。还认识到了其他可能改变治疗方法的情况。
胸腰椎损伤手术治疗的决策很大程度上取决于患者的三个特征:损伤形态、神经学状态和后韧带完整性。基于这些特征的合理且实用的决策过程甚至可以指导最复杂骨折类型的治疗。