Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21 Suppl):S235-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f32734.
Systematic literature review.
A systematic review was designed to answer 3 primary research questions: (1) What is the most useful classification system for surgical and nonsurgical decision-making with regard to thoracolumbar (TL) spine injuries? (2) For a TL burst fracture with incomplete neurologic deficit, what is the optimal surgical approach and stabilization technique? (3) Is complete disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex an indication for surgical intervention for TL burst fractures?
Despite a long history of descriptive and clinical series, there remains considerable controversy and wide variation in the treatment of traumatic TL spine injuries.
A comprehensive search of the English literature was conducted using Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Standardized grading systems were used to assess the level of evidence and quality of articles impacting the research questions.
Recommendations for the primary research questions were as follows: (1) Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System seems to be the best system available for therapeutic decision-making for TL spine injuries (strength of recommendation: weak; quality of evidence: low). (2) There is no specific surgical approach in the case of a TL burst fracture with incomplete neurologic deficit that has any advantage with regard to neurologic recovery (strength of recommendation: weak; quality of evidence: low). (3) Complete disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex as determined collectively by morphologic criteria using plain radiographs and computed tomography is an indication for surgical intervention in TL burst fractures (strength of recommendation: strong; quality of evidence: low).
Based on this systematic review of the literature only very low to moderate quality studies could be identified to address clinical questions related to TL spine trauma. These findings suggest the need for further study, including emphasis on higher quality studies.
系统文献回顾。
本系统回顾旨在回答 3 个主要研究问题:(1)在胸腰椎(TL)脊柱损伤的手术和非手术决策方面,最有用的分类系统是什么?(2)对于不完全性神经功能缺损的 TL 爆裂骨折,最佳的手术入路和固定技术是什么?(3)后韧带复合体完全断裂是否是 TL 爆裂骨折手术干预的指征?
尽管有很长的描述性和临床系列的历史,但在创伤性 TL 脊柱损伤的治疗方面仍存在相当大的争议和广泛的差异。
使用 Medline 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库对英文文献进行全面检索。使用标准化分级系统评估影响研究问题的文章的证据水平和质量。
对主要研究问题的建议如下:(1)TL 损伤分类系统似乎是 TL 脊柱损伤治疗决策的最佳系统(推荐强度:弱;证据质量:低)。(2)对于不完全性神经功能缺损的 TL 爆裂骨折,没有任何特定的手术入路在神经恢复方面具有优势(推荐强度:弱;证据质量:低)。(3)形态学标准(包括平片和 CT)联合确定的后韧带复合体完全断裂是 TL 爆裂骨折手术干预的指征(推荐强度:强;证据质量:低)。
根据对文献的系统回顾,仅能确定非常低到中等质量的研究来解决与 TL 脊柱创伤相关的临床问题。这些发现表明需要进一步研究,包括强调更高质量的研究。