Basilevsky Mikhail V, Leontyev Igor V, Luschekina Sofia V, Kondakova Olga A, Sulimov Vladimir B
Karpov Institute of Physical Chemistry, ul. Vorontsovo Pole 10, 105064 Moscow, Russia.
J Comput Chem. 2006 Apr 15;27(5):552-70. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20332.
A new approach for computing hydration free energies DeltaG(solv) of organic solutes is formulated and parameterized. The method combines a conventional PCM (polarizable continuum model) computation for the electrostatic component DeltaG(el) of DeltaG(solv) and a specially detailed algorithm for treating the complementary nonelectrostatic contributions (DeltaG(nel)). The novel features include the following: (a) two different cavities are used for treating DeltaG(el) and DeltaG(nel). For the latter case the cavity is larger and based on thermal atomic radii (i.e., slightly reduced van der Waals radii). (b) The cavitation component of DeltaG(nel) is taken to be proportional to the volume of the large cavity. (c) In the treatment of van der Waals interactions, all solute atoms are counted explicitly. The corresponding interaction energies are computed as integrals over the surface of the larger cavity; they are based on Lennard Jones (LJ) type potentials for individual solute atoms. The weighting coefficients of these LJ terms are considered as fitting parameters. Testing this method on a collection of 278 uncharged organic solutes gave satisfactory results. The average error (RMSD) between calculated and experimental free energy values varies between 0.15 and 0.5 kcal/mol for different classes of solutes. The larger deviations found for the case of oxygen compounds are probably due to a poor approximation of H-bonding in terms of LJ potentials. For the seven compounds with poorest fit to experiment, the error exceeds 1.5 kcal/mol; these outlier points were not included in the parameterization procedure. Several possible origins of these errors are discussed.
一种计算有机溶质水合自由能ΔG(solv)的新方法被制定并参数化。该方法将用于计算ΔG(solv)的静电成分ΔG(el)的传统PCM(极化连续介质模型)计算与用于处理互补非静电贡献(ΔG(nel))的特殊详细算法相结合。新特性包括以下几点:(a) 使用两种不同的腔体来处理ΔG(el)和ΔG(nel)。对于后者情况,腔体更大且基于热原子半径(即稍微减小的范德华半径)。(b) 将ΔG(nel)的空穴形成成分视为与大腔体的体积成比例。(c) 在处理范德华相互作用时,明确计算所有溶质原子。相应的相互作用能作为在较大腔体表面上的积分来计算;它们基于单个溶质原子的 Lennard Jones(LJ)型势。这些LJ项的加权系数被视为拟合参数。在一组278种不带电有机溶质上测试该方法得到了令人满意的结果。对于不同类别的溶质,计算得到的自由能值与实验值之间的平均误差(RMSD)在0.15至0.5 kcal/mol之间变化。在含氧化合物情况下发现的较大偏差可能是由于用LJ势对氢键的近似不佳。对于拟合实验最差的七种化合物,误差超过1.5 kcal/mol;这些异常点未包含在参数化过程中。讨论了这些误差的几个可能来源。