Harvey A J, Soliman H, Kaiser W J, Miller L K
Department of Genetics, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Cell Death Differ. 1997 Dec;4(8):733-44. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400294.
The anti-apoptotic activities of two baculovirus IAPs, OpIAP and CpIAP, were directly compared with that of two Drosophila IAPs, DIAP1 and DIAP2, in the same insect cell line, SF-21 cells. Like OpIAP and CpIAP, DIAP1 inhibited actinomycin D-induced apoptosis and apoptosis induced by Doom. Removal of the RING finger of DIAP1 reduced but did not eliminate its anti-apoptotic activity. DIAP2 was unable to inhibit actinomycin-D induced apoptosis but was able to partially inhibit Doom-induced apoptosis. The baculoviral BIR and RING finger regions, when separated, were unable to block apoptosis induced by actinomycin D or Doom. Instead, the BIR regions of OpIAP and CpIAP as well as the RING finger regions of CpIAP and DIAP1 induced apoptosis. Thus, there were significant differences in the manner in which the different domains of the viral and cellular homologues of IAPs interacted with the components of the pathways regulating apoptosis in SF-21 cells.
在同一昆虫细胞系SF-21细胞中,直接比较了两种杆状病毒IAP(OpIAP和CpIAP)与两种果蝇IAP(DIAP1和DIAP2)的抗凋亡活性。与OpIAP和CpIAP一样,DIAP1抑制放线菌素D诱导的凋亡以及由Doom诱导的凋亡。去除DIAP1的环指结构可降低但并未消除其抗凋亡活性。DIAP2无法抑制放线菌素D诱导的凋亡,但能够部分抑制Doom诱导的凋亡。杆状病毒的BIR和环指结构域分开时,无法阻断放线菌素D或Doom诱导的凋亡。相反,OpIAP和CpIAP的BIR结构域以及CpIAP和DIAP1的环指结构域会诱导凋亡。因此,IAPs的病毒和细胞同源物的不同结构域与SF-21细胞中调节凋亡途径的成分相互作用的方式存在显著差异。