Suppr超能文献

烟曲霉、土曲霉、构巢曲霉、白色念珠菌和葡萄牙念珠菌的原发性临床分离株对两性霉素B的固有体外敏感性。

Intrinsic in vitro susceptibility of primary clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus nidulans, Candida albicans and Candida lusitaniae against amphotericin B.

作者信息

Singh Jagpal, Rimek Dagmar, Kappe Reinhard

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Haema Institute of Laboratory Medicine at the Helios Medical Center, Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2006 Mar;49(2):96-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01197.x.

Abstract

A total of 60 clinical fungal isolates from patients without prior amphotericin B treatment and three control strains were evaluated for their intrinsic susceptibility to amphotericin B (AmB) using microdilution, Etest and disc diffusion assays, on three media each, Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640, Antibiotic Medium 3 (AM3) and High Resolution Medium. The fungal strains included isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 10), Aspergillus terreus (n = 12), Aspergillus nidulans (n = 9), Candida albicans (n = 6) and Candida lusitaniae (n = 23). The A. terreus strains were significantly less susceptible to AmB than the A. fumigatus strains in all nine experimental settings (P-values ranging from 0.009 to <0.00001). The A. nidulans strains were equally susceptible to AmB as the A. fumigatus strains in seven of nine experimental settings and less susceptible in two (microdilution performed on RPMI and AM3, P = 0.01 and 0.007). The C. lusitaniae strains were equally susceptible to AmB as the C. albicans strains in seven of nine experimental settings and more susceptible in two (microdilution and Etest, both performed on AM3, P = 0.01 and 0.0002). Thus, we confirmed that A. terreus is intrinsically less susceptible to AmB than A. fumigatus. In contrast, nine German clinical isolates of Aspergillus nidulans were found equally susceptible to AmB as 10 isolates of A. fumigatus. Furthermore, we found 23 German clinical isolates of C. lusitaniae from patients without prior treatment with AmB equally susceptible to AmB as C. albicans.

摘要

使用微量稀释法、Etest法和纸片扩散法,在罗斯韦尔帕克纪念研究所(RPMI)1640培养基、3号抗生素培养基(AM3)和高分辨率培养基这三种培养基上,对60株未经两性霉素B预先治疗的患者临床真菌分离株和3株对照菌株进行两性霉素B(AmB)内在敏感性评估。真菌菌株包括烟曲霉分离株(n = 10)、土曲霉分离株(n = 12)、构巢曲霉分离株(n = 9)、白色念珠菌分离株(n = 6)和葡萄牙念珠菌分离株(n = 23)。在所有九个实验设置中,土曲霉菌株对AmB的敏感性显著低于烟曲霉菌株(P值范围为0.009至<0.00001)。在九个实验设置中的七个中,构巢曲霉菌株对AmB的敏感性与烟曲霉菌株相同,在两个设置中敏感性较低(在RPMI和AM3上进行微量稀释,P = 0.01和0.007)。在九个实验设置中的七个中,葡萄牙念珠菌菌株对AmB的敏感性与白色念珠菌菌株相同,在两个设置中更敏感(在AM3上进行微量稀释和Etest,P = 0.01和0.0002)。因此,我们证实土曲霉对AmB的内在敏感性低于烟曲霉。相比之下,发现9株德国临床构巢曲霉分离株对AmB的敏感性与10株烟曲霉分离株相同。此外,我们发现23株来自未经AmB预先治疗的患者的德国临床葡萄牙念珠菌分离株对AmB的敏感性与白色念珠菌相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验